1985 PLP 1319 (MLD)
ABDUL QAYUM — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1985 PLP 1319 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Abdul Razzak A. Thahim, J |
| Parties | ABDUL QAYUM — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1888)- |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 1319 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1888)- as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 1319 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdul Razzak A. Thahim, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 1319 (MLD) (ABDUL QAYUM — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 342/377/511--Bail--F.I.R. delayed by two days--Only attempt to commit unnatural offence having been alleged--Offence not punishable with ten years or above Accused admitted to bail. Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Applicant. Muhammad Ibrahim Memon, Additional A--G, for the S fate.
Judgment & Decree
Sardar Muhammad Ishaque for Applicant. Muhammad Ibrahim Memon, Additional A--G, for the S fate. The case against the applicant and others has been registered under sections 342, 377 and 511 , P. P. C ., on 14-4-1985 at Police Station Pak Colony, Karachi. Complainant Ahmed Khan in his F.I. Fl. stated that his son Muhammad Akram informed him that on 12--4-1985 at 9.00 p.m. three boys of Mohallah namely; Qayoom, Muhammad Shafi and Bhoora took him in a lane and his Shalwar was put off but he raised cries anti accused ran away. Mr. Sardar Muhammad- Ishaque, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant contended that there is delay in lodging the F.I.R. and there is no medical certificate to support the case of complainant. Mr. Muhammad Ibrahim Memon, the [earned Additional A.-G. had no objection to the grant of bail. The incident took place on 12-4-1985 and report has been lodged after two days. The allegation against the applicant is that of an attempt only. In these circumstances, the offence for which applicant is charged is not punishable with 10 years or above. He is admitted to bail on furnishing one surety in the sum of Rs.30,000 and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned IXth Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi. S.A. Bail accepted.