1989 P Cr (PLP)
KHURSHID BEGUM‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE and 2 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Nasir Aslam Zahid and Syed Ally Madad Shah, JJ |
| Parties | KHURSHID BEGUM‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE and 2 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Nasir Aslam Zahid and Syed Ally Madad Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (KHURSHID BEGUM‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE and 2 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ahmedullah Farooqui for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 417(2)‑‑Appeal against judgment in criminal case and civil suit on the same subject pending in High Court‑‑Effect‑‑Appellant willing to withdraw appeal but requesting Court to make observation that judgment of the Magistrate would not affect civil suit‑‑Held, that no observation was necessary as it was obvious that the civil suit would be decided on basis of evidence produced in that suit and as such any observation made in the judgment of the Magistrate would have no bearing on the merits of civil suit‑‑Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.‑‑[Judgment]. Murtaza Hussain for the State. Salima Nasiruddin for private Respondents Nos. 2 and 3.
Judgment & Decree
NASIR ASLAM ZAHID, J.‑‑ During the arguments of this case when it was pointed out to the learned counsel for the appellant that the civil suit filed by the appellant is pending in this Court and the question of maintainability of this appeal is also not free from difficulty, learned counsel for the appellant states that he is not pressing this appeal. He further submits that an observation may be made in this order that the judgment of the Magistrate in this case will not affect the civil suit filed by the appellant and pending in this Court. Criminal Acquittal Appeal No. 95 of 1982 is dismissed as withdrawn. As regard the effect of the judgment of the learned Magistrate in the criminal case, it is not necessary to make any observation as it is obvious that the civil suit will be decided on the basis of the evidence produced in that suit and any observation made in the judgment of the learned Magistrate will have no bearing on the merits of the civil suit. ?/K‑121/K Appeal dismissed.