1994 PLP 818 (MLD)
RAHAT SADIO — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1994 PLP 818 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | RAHAT SADIO — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Lahore Examination Rules, 1993 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 818 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Lahore Examination Rules, 1993 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 818 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 818 (MLD) (RAHAT SADIO — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE through Chairman and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Rehmat Khan for Petitioners.
- Ch. Ejaz Ahmad with Shahid Waheed for Respondents..
- Ch. Ejaz Ahmad learned counsel appearing for respondents has reiterated his argument advanced earlier in the fore-mentioned writ petition and has stated that after the deletion of Rule 12, the concessional marks are no more available.
Headnotes / Summary
. 12
Concessional marks
Candidate seeking direction from Court for grant of concessional marks under R.12 of the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Examination Rules, 1993 had contended that High Court had already issued direction for grant of concessional marks through its judgment in other case wherein identical points of law and facts were involved
Earlier judgment of Court according to which concessional marks were granted being in field, Court directed Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education to grant concessional marks accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
Petitioner through this Constitutional petition has sought direction for the grant of concessional marks under Rule 12 of the Board of Intermediate Examination Rules 1993. It is the case of the petitioner that she appeared in Intermediate Annual Examination, 1993 (Composite System) conducted by the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore and failed to qualify a subject. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has argued that this Court has already issued direction for the grant of concessional marks in Writ Petition No.15235 of 1993 through its judgment, dated 30-11-1993 wherein identical points of law and facts were involved. Ch. Ejaz Ahmad learned counsel appearing for respondents has reiterated his argument advanced earlier in the fore-mentioned writ petition and has stated that after the deletion of Rule 12, the concessional marks are no more available. I have given my anxious consideration and have noticed that the facts and points involved in the present writ petition are completely the same as were considered/decided by me through Writ Petition No.15235 of 1993. In this view of the matter I do not feel it necessary to repeat the same all again. Since the judgment is already in field and no argument has been advanced by the learned counsel for the respondent so as to take a different view, as such, I accept this writ petition and direct the respondent Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education to grant concessional marks as envisaged under Rule 12 of Intermediate Examination Rules to the petitioner after full verification. There shall be no order as to costs. H.B.T./R-120/L Petition accepted.