PLC(CS) 2023

2023 PLP (C (PLC(CS))

NOSHAD ALI Versus GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan and 4 others

Jurisdiction / Court
Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan
Decided Date
Writ Petition No.652 of 2022, decided on 3rd April, 2023.
Honorable Judges
Ali Baig, CJ and Javed Ahmed, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2023 PLP (C (PLC(CS))
Forum / Court Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan
Bench Members Ali Baig, CJ and Javed Ahmed, J
Parties NOSHAD ALI Versus GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan and 4 others
Primary Law Civil service
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2023 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

This judgment primarily cites: Civil service as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2023 PLP (C (PLC(CS))?

The case was heard and decided by the Chief Court Gilgit-Baltistan bench comprising: Ali Baig, CJ and Javed Ahmed, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2023 PLP (C (PLC(CS)) (NOSHAD ALI Versus GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN through Chief Secretary Gilgit-Baltistan and 4 others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Civil service

Representation

  • Israr Hussain for Petitioner.
  • Muhammad Qadir assisted by L.A. Tufail Ahmed for Respondents.

Headnotes / Summary

Appointment on the basis of Prime Minister's Assistance Package

Petitioner being son of deceased permanent employee had sought directions for his appointment on the basis of said Package after about 12 years of demise of his father

Contention of the petitioner was that he was minor at the time of death of his father (permanent employee in Education Department)

Validity

Father of the petitioner passed away in the year 2010 as evident from the relevant Death Certificate, however, record revealed that, in the very next year, the daughter of the deceased was appointed by the respondents (Education Department) against vacant post of BPS-01 under the Prime Minister's Assistance Package

Said fact had been concealed by the petitioner while filing present writ petition before the Chief Court

Since the employment admissible under Prime Minister's Assistance Package had already been availed by the daughter of the deceased employee, therefore, the petitioner was not entitled for appointment against any post under the Prime Minister Assistance Package

Writ petition moved by the petitioner under Art. 86(2) of the Government of Gilgit-Baltistan Order 2018, being devoid of merit, was dismissed, in circumstances.

Judgment & Decree

ALI BAIG, C.J.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 86(2) of the Govt. of Gilgit-Baltistan Order, 2018 seeking issuance of necessary directions to the answering respondents to appoint the petitioner as EST (BPS-14) or UDC (BPS-14) in Education Department Gilgit-Baltistan under the PM Assistance Package.

2. Brief facts of the case collected from the available record are that the present petitioner is real son of late Ameen Shah, who was permanent employee of Education Department and was serving as driver. The aforesaid employee had died during his service on 13th January, 2010. The petition being legal heir of the aforesaid deceased employee have sought relief as stated herein above under the PM Assistance Package introduced by the government for family members of government servants who die during their service.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner being legal heir of the deceased government employee is entitled for employment under the PM Assistance Package. The learned counsel for the petitioner further argued that at the time of death of his father in the year 2010, the petitioner was minor, therefore the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition after attaining the age of 18 years. The learned counsel for the petitioner further argued that as per relevant notifications of the provincial government, the respondents are bound to appoint one family member of the above named deceased employee against any permanent posts of his qualification/eligibility. The learned counsel for the petitioner further argued that the mother of the petitioner has nominated him for employment under the PM Assistance Package and the petitioner is graduate from KIU GB, hence the respondents may be directed to appoint him against any post of EST (BPS-14) or UDC (BPS-14) in Education Department GB.

4. Conversely, the learned DAG assisted by L.A controverted the argument advanced by the learned counsel for the petition by contending that the daughter of the deceased employee namely Sajida Jahan has availed employment under the PM's Assistance Package soon after the death of his father, hence the present petitioner has no right to get employment under the PM's Assistance Package. The learned DAG and L.A further contended that the deceased government employee was died in the year 2010 and the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition after lapse of 13 years, as such the writ petition of the petitioner is time barred. The learned DAG and L.A further contended that the respondents have appointed one family member of the deceased government employee namely Mst. Sajida Jahan under the PM's Assistance Package, vide office order dated 19.03.2011, hence the plea of the petitioner is baseless and groundless, as such the instant writ petition being meritless is liable to be dismissed.

5. We have heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the record available on file with their able assistance.

6. From perusal of record it transpires that father of the present petitioner namely Amin Shah was passed away on 13.01.2010 as evident from Death Certificate issued by Assistant Commissioner Gilgit dated 05.03.2010. Mrs. Sajida Jahan daughter of late Amin Shah has already, been appointed by the respondents against clear vacant post of BPS-01 under the Prime Minister Assistance Package, vide office order No.DGC-1(2)/2011/522 dated 19.03.2011. This fact has been concealed by the petitioner while filing the instant writ petition before this Court.

7. Since the employment admissible under PM's Assistance Package has already been availed by the daughter of the deceased employee, therefore, the present petitioner is not entitled for appointment against any post under the PM's Assistance Package.

8. For what has been discussed above, this writ petition being devoid of merit is hereby dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to file civil suit against the respondents in the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction if he thinks that his sister has not been appointed under the PM's Assistance Package if so desired.

9. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. File MQ/112/GB Petition dismissed.