2012 P Cr (PLP)
IQBAL KHAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2012 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Sindh |
| Bench Members | Faisal Arab and Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, JJ |
| Parties | IQBAL KHAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2012 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2012 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Sindh bench comprising: Faisal Arab and Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2012 P Cr (PLP) (IQBAL KHAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mehmood A. Qureshi and Jamshed Iqbal for Appellant.
Headnotes / Summary
Ss. 6 & 9(c)
Possession and trafficking of narcotics
Allegation against the accused was that he was the guard (chowkidar) of a godown from which 5000 kilograms of charas was recovered which had been locked in a container
Contentions of the accused were that he was only the guard (chowkidar) of the godown and nothing was brought on evidence to show that he was aware that the narcotic substance was hidden in the container, and that knowledge with regard to the narcotic substance could not be attributed to the accused
Persons nominated in the F.I.R. for attempting to smuggle the narcotics had not been arrested
Neither anything was recovered from the accused who was a guard (chowkidar) of the godown nor on his pointation the narcotic was recovered from the hidden cavities of the container
Perusal of record revealed that no investigation was conducted to find out the smugglers or to connect the accused with the narcotic substance
Both the witnesses had deposed that the accused was a guard (chowkidar) of the godown
Benefit of doubt, in circumstances, had to be extended to the accused
Appeal was allowed, impugned judgment was set aside and directions were given to release the accused if not required in any other case. Syed Ashfaque Hussain Rizvi, Special Prosecutor, ANF for the State. Appellant produced in custody.
Judgment & Decree
The case of the prosecution in the F.I.R. No.15 of 2008 under section 6/9-C, Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997, registered at Police Station Karachi, was that police received spy information that several international narcotic smugglers namely Mushtaq, Rashid, Khuramzeb, Lal Badshah, Bilal, Tariq and Naeemullah intend to smuggle huge quantity of charas that is hidden in Container No.GESU-4206355 loaded on Trailer No. P-6168 in the guise of rice bags. The trailer came from Peshawar and was parked in Godown No.F-713, SITE area, Metrovel, Karachi. Upon receipt of such information, raid was conducted, where the police functionaries found the present appellant Iqbal Khan, who disclosed that he is Chowkidar of the Godown. He also disclosed to the police that the owner of the Godown is Tariq Khan, and the trailer was driven by Lal Badshah. The appellant further disclosed that Tariq Khan has other partners namely Mushtaq, Rashid, Khuramzeb, Bilal, and Naeemullah. Upon personal search of the present appellant, only his personal belongings were recovered. Thereafter the lock of the container which was loaded on the trailer was broken and from the internal cavities 200 blue colour nylon bags were recovered. In all 5000 Kgs of Charas was recovered from these bags. The appellant was tried by Special Court-I (Control of Narcotic Substances) at Karachi and was convicted to suffer life imprisonment. Counsel for the appellant argued that the appellant was only Chowkidar of the Godown and nothing was brought in evidence to show that he was aware that the narcotic substance was hidden in the container nor the knowledge could be attributed to the appellant with regard to the narcotic substance. On the other hand, Special Prosecutor for ANF contended that since the narcotic substance was recovered from the trailer parked in the Godown which was under the charge of the Chowkidar, therefore, the appellant is directly involved with the commission of the crime and he was rightly convicted by the trial Court. At the trial two witnesses were examined by the prosecution. The persons who are stated to have attempted to smuggle the narcotic substance, though are nominated in the F.I.R., but none of them was arrested. Nothing was recovered from the present appellant who was Chowkidar of the Godown nor on his pointation the narcotic substance was recovered from the hidden cavities of the container. The record also does not show that any investigation was made to find out the accused smugglers or to connect the appellant with the narcotic substance. Both the witnesses deposed what has been stated in the F.I.R. i.e. the appellant was Chowkidar of the Godown. No other piece of evidence was brought on record to connect the present appellant with the narcotic substance, hence the benefit of doubt should have been extended to the appellant. Under the above facts and circumstances of the case, we, therefore, set aside the impugned judgment and allow this appeal. The appellant Iqbal Khan was brought to this Court in the present case shall be returned back to the Central Prison, Karachi, and thereafter he shall be released if not required in any other case. M.W.A./I-9/K Appeal allowed.