1987 P Cr (PLP)
ABDUL RAUF‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Abdul Razzak A.Thahim, J |
| Parties | ABDUL RAUF‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdul Razzak A.Thahim, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (ABDUL RAUF‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Arts. 3 & 4‑‑Bail‑‑Contraband‑‑Dispute existing about the quantity of Heroin secured from accused and the quantity which was sent to Chemical Examiner‑‑Prosecution having no objection to grant of bail, same was allowed. Syed Saeed Hassan for Applicant. M.I. Memon, A.A.‑G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Bail Application No. 1406 of 1986, decided on 9th October, 1986. ‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Arts. 3 & 4‑‑Bail‑‑Contraband‑‑Dispute existing about the quantity of Heroin secured from accused and the quantity which was sent to Chemical Examiner‑‑Prosecution having no objection to grant of bail, same was allowed. Syed Saeed Hassan for Applicant. M.I. Memon, A.A.‑G. for the State. The allegation against the applicant is that he was found in possession of 20 grams of Heroin at Bus Stop No. 2 in Moosa Colony, Federal 'B' Area, Karachi. Such case under section 3/4 Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979 has been registered and the case is pending against him. It is contended by Mr. Syed Saeed Hassan, Advocate for the applicant that in F.I.R. it is stated that a packet of Heroin was recovered from the applicant whereas in Mashirnama it is mentioned that one Puri was secured from the applicant. It has also been argued that the entire quantity of alleged Heroin was not sent to the Chemical Examiner. Mr. M.I. Memon learned A.A.‑G. has frankly stated that there is a confusion between the Mashirnama and the F.I.R. and it is also not clear how much quantity of Heroin was sent to the Chemical Examiner. In view of the circumstances stated above when there is a dispute about the quantity of the heroin secured from the applicant and it is also not clear how much quantity was sent to the Chemical Examiner. Learned A.A.‑G. has also no objection to the grant of bail. Applicant is admitted to bail in the sum of Rs.30,000 with one surety and P.R. in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, West Karachi. The observations are of tentative nature and may not be considered by the trial Judge. The case to be decided on the evidence on merits. M.Y.H./A‑35/K Bail granted.