1989 PLP 4676(2) (MLD)
MUHAMMAD BILAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent.
| Citation | 1989 PLP 4676(2) (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Munir Khan, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD BILAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent. |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 4676(2) (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 4676(2) (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Munir Khan, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 4676(2) (MLD) (MUHAMMAD BILAL‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent.). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rana Ijaz Ahmad Khan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 436, 148, 149 & 109‑‑Bail, grant of‑ Accused came alongwith his co‑accused to the place of occurrence, duly armed‑ Deceased was not only chased by accused but was also given injuries with sota‑ Blunt weapon injuries were found on the person of deceased‑‑Accused had been challaned to face the trial‑‑It could not be said that there were no reasonable grounds to believe that he had committed the alleged offence‑‑Bail refused in circumstances. Tauqeer Ullah Shah assisted by Arshad Mehmood for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Rana Ijaz Ahmad Khan for Petitioner. Tauqeer Ullah Shah assisted by Arshad Mehmood for the State. This is an application for grant of bail to Muhammad Bilal petitioner in case under section 302, 436, 148, 149 and 109 P.P.C. registered at P.S. Satiana vide F.I.R. No. 213 dated 1‑8‑1987.
2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner and 12 others variously harmed, in furtherance of their common object, launched attack on Naik Muhammad and caused his death on 1‑8‑1987 in the area of Chak No. 39/GB of Police Station Satiana. As for the petitioner it has been alleged that he had given sota blows on the shoulder and other parts of the body of the deceased.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was found innocent by the D.S.P.; that he did not cause any injury to the deceased and that after the infliction of serious injuries by the co‑accused, there was no need for giving sota blows to the deceased and as such, the part attributed to the petitioner is false and fabricated. Learned counsel for the State has opposed this application.
4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties with care. I have not been able to persuade myself to agree with him. I find that the petitioner duly armed, came alongwith his co‑accused to the place of occurrence; that when the deceased ran to save his life, the petitioner not only chased him but also inflicted him injuries; that the police has not placed his name in column No. 2 of the challan, he has been challaned to face trial and that the post‑mortem examination report shows that the deceased had received injuries by blunt weapon on shoulder and other parts of his body. In view of the material collected by the police against the petitioner, it cannot be said that there arc not reasonable grounds to believe that he has committed the alleged offences. For what has been said above, there being no merit, the petition is dismissed. S.A./M‑1633/L Bail refused.