2007 PLP 1066 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD YASIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2007 PLP 1066 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD YASIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 1066 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 1066 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 1066 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD YASIN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Zafar Iqbal Chohan for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 426
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302(b)
Petition for
Fatal injury to injured was attributed to father of petitioner
Petitioner was allegedly armed with a pistol which he did not use during the occurrence
Case being fit for further appreciation of evidence, petitioner was released on bail after suspending his sentence.
Judgment & Decree
M.A. SHAHID SIDDIQUI, J.
Muhammad Yasin, petitioner has sought suspension of his sentence and release on bail. He has been convicted under section 302(b)/34, P.P.C. and sentenced to reigorous imprisonment for life. He was directed to pay Rs.40,000 as compensation to the legal heirs of the deceased and in default of payment thereof to go further simple imprisonment for six months vide judgment, dated 29-7-2006 passed by a learned Additional Sessions Judge at Depalpur.
2. Arguments heard and record perused. The fatal injury to Mst. Ghulam Fatima was attributed to Muhammad Jaffar father of the petitioner. The petitioner was allegedly armed with a pistol which he did not use during the occurrence. Considering it a fit case for further appreciation of evidence, I accept this application and order the release of the petitioner on bail subject to furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. H.B.T./M-155/L Sentence suspended.