1987 P Cr (PLP)
QUDRATULLAH alias QUDRAT ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J |
| Parties | QUDRATULLAH alias QUDRAT ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 P Cr (PLP) (QUDRATULLAH alias QUDRAT ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Hussain Chhachhar for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302--Bail,"grant of--No evidence against petitioner to connect him with commission of offence--Petitioner also found innocent during investigation and shown in column No. 2 of challan--Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. Sardar Khurshid for the State.
Judgment & Decree
S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302--Bail,"grant of--No evidence against petitioner to connect him with commission of offence--Petitioner also found innocent during investigation and shown in column No. 2 of challan--Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances. Ch. Muhammad Hussain Chhachhar for Petitioner. Sardar Khurshid for the State. Qudrat Ullah alias Qudrat Ali petitioner has moved this petition of bail in a case registered against him and his son Muhammad Ayub under section 302/34, P.P.C. 2. The case was registered on 15-9-1986 on the application of Manzur Ahmad complainant wherein he alleged that his sister Mst.Pathani was murdered by her husband Muhammad Ayub and his father Qudrat Ullah petitioner either by strangulation or by administering poison and that her dead body should be exhumed to ascertain the cause of death. Consequently, the dead body was exhumed and post-mortem examination was conducted. The opinion regarding the cause of death was deferred till the receipt of report of the Chemical Examiner. The Chemical Examiner has reported that insecticide belonging to chlorinated hydrocarbon group was detected from liquefying mass from the sites of stomach, liver, bladder and skull. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends and learned counsel for the State concedes that there is no evidence against the petitioner Perusal of the file also reveals that there is no evident against him. He has been found innocent during the investigation and shown in, column No.2 of the challan. In the circumstances, he is admitted to bail subject to furnishing security in the sum bf Rs.20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Okara. S. G. D. Bail allowed.