P L D 1959 W (PLP)
NAWAB DIN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑Respondents
| Citation | P L D 1959 W (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | |
| Bench Members | A. K. Malik, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan |
| Parties | NAWAB DIN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1959 W (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1959 W (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: A. K. Malik, Member, Board of Revenue, West Pakistan.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1959 W (PLP) (NAWAB DIN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE and another‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- A. R. Niazi, for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Punjab Laws Act (IV of 1872), S. 39‑A‑Chowkidar‑Deputy Commissioner's order creating additional post‑Additional Commis sioner setting aside order‑No further appeal or revision lies Chawkidari Rules, r: 42.
Judgment & Decree
Punjab Laws Act (IV of 1872), S. 39‑A‑Chowkidar‑Deputy Commissioner's order creating additional post‑Additional Commis sioner setting aside order‑No further appeal or revision lies Chawkidari Rules, r:
42. A. R. Niazi, for Petitioner. This purports to be a revision petition against the order of the Additional Commissioner (Revenue), Multan, dated 28‑6‑56, by which he upset the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Lyallpur on 3‑7‑54, creating a second post of a Chawkidar in Chak No. 221 G. B. Tahsil Samundri, district Lyallpur. Mr. A. R. Niazi is present and has been heard ‑for the peti tioner. 'According to Rule 42 of Rules, framed under section, 39 (A) of the Punjab Laws Act all orders of Deputy Commissioners in regard to fixing of the number of village watchman etc. shall be subject to control, revision, alteration by the Commissioner to whom he is subordinate. There is no provision for a further appeal or revision to any other authority. In the circumstances I am of the view that a revision in this case does not lie and the petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine. A. H. Petition dismissed.