1986 PLP 1298 (SCMR)
SARDAR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus AKHTARI BEGUM and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1298 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ |
| Parties | SARDAR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus AKHTARI BEGUM and others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1298 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1298 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1298 (SCMR) (SARDAR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus AKHTARI BEGUM and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Respondents Nos. 1 and 9 to 11.
- S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Respondents Nos. 2 to 8.
- Ch. Abdul Rehman, Advocate‑on‑Record and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for the Petitioner.
- S. Abid Nawaz, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Respondents Nos. 2 to 8.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 24-10-1979 of the Lahore High Court in Civil Revision No.976 of 1978). --Art. 185(3)--Leave to appeal, grant of--Temporary injunction- Impugned order setting aside temporary injunction consistent with views expressed by Supreme Court and provisions of law--Observations made by High Court to be treated of tentative nature not prejudicing final determination of case--Leave to appeal refused. Ch. Abdul Rehman, Advocate-on-Record and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for the Petitioner.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑This petition is directed against the judgment, dated 24‑10‑1979 by which Civil Revision No. 976 of 1978 filed by Respondents 1‑8 herein was accepted by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court and the temporary injunction issued in favour of the petitioner was set aside. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner we do not feel inclined to grant leave to appeal in this matter, as the impugned order of the High Court is consistent with the views expressed by this Court in Additional Settlement Commissioner (Land) v. Muhammad Shafi P L D 1971 S C 791 and the provisions of the Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application (Removal of Difficulties) Act, 1975. Needless to say that the observations made in the High Court order being in relation to an interlocutory matter will be treated to be of a tentative nature and will not prejudice the final determination of the case. M.I. Petition dismissed.