1987 PLP 1714 (SCMR)
Professor ATTAUL HAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus INAYAT SAEED and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1714 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | Professor ATTAUL HAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus INAYAT SAEED and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1714 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1714 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1714 (SCMR) (Professor ATTAUL HAQ‑‑Petitioner Versus INAYAT SAEED and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Ilyas Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. M. Z. Khalid, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Yusaf Ali Khan, Bar at Law and Mahmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 9th June, 1987.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 9‑2‑1986 passed in Writ Petition No.159 of 1985). ‑‑‑S. 13‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal, grant of‑‑Ejectment matter‑‑Impugned judgment based on a finding of fact‑‑No question of law requiring decision by Supreme Court involved‑‑Leave to appeal refused.
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑ Mr. Attaul Haq Qureshi seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 9‑2‑1986, dismissing his writ petition in a case under the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959. 2 We have gone through the impugned judgment and heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at some length. We find that the impugned judgment is based on a finding of fact and the matter does not involve any question of law requiring decision by this Court. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. M.I. /A‑79/S. Petition dismissed