1988 PLP 1336 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Petitioner Versus Mst. NASREEN and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1988 PLP 1336 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Petitioner Versus Mst. NASREEN and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1336 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1336 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1336 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Petitioner Versus Mst. NASREEN and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- S.M. Tayyab, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 11th May, 1988.
- Ch. Mushtaq Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Abul Aasim Jafri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- S.M. Tayyab, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order dated 13-4-1987 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, passed in Writ Petition No.4418 of 19F6).
S.25--Custody of minor--Arrangement of meetings between father and minor child agreed to between parties being fair, Supreme Court converted petition into appeal and disposed of same in terms of agreement between the parties.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑This petition relates to a dispute between the parties over the custody of a minor boy After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner gave up the point with regard to the question as to who ‑at the present stage is entitled to the custody of the boy. He, however, contended that the arrangement of meetings between the petitioner and the boy made so for, may require re‑examination in the interest of the welfare of the minor.
2. On our asking both the learned counsel and their clients entered into negotiations on the aforestated dispute and as a result whereof an amicable agreement has been reached, which is reproduced below: ‑‑ "
1. That parties to the titled C.P.S.L.A. have entered into a compromise on the following terms and conditions: ‑‑ (a) That titled C.P.S.L.A. shall be withdrawn. (b) That the respondent or her representative shall take the minor Muhammad Tahir to the house of Haji Muhammad Sharif real brother of Muhammad Latif father of respondent at Batapur on each alternate Friday in each month where petitioner and his other family members may meet the said minor for three hours i.e. 10 a.m. to 1‑00 p. m. (c) Parties shall bear their own costs.
3. The arrangement is fair, we convert this petition into appeal and dispose of the same in terms of the afore‑recorded agreement. There shall be no order as to costs. M.B. A. /M‑461/S?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Order accordingly.