MLD 1989

1989 PLP 3977 (MLD)

MUHAMMAD AYUB‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1438/B of 1989, decided on 3rd June, 1989.
Honorable Judges
Ijaz Nisar, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 3977 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Ijaz Nisar, J
Parties MUHAMMAD AYUB‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 3977 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 3977 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 3977 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD AYUB‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

Representation

  • Syed Nadeem Saqlain for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss.10 & 18‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑Girl was taken by accused to his house‑‑Zina was neither committed nor attempted‑‑Father of girl had forgiven accused‑‑Bail allowed in circumstances. Rana Abdul Hamid for the State.

Judgment & Decree

Syed Nadeem Saqlain for Petitioner. Rana Abdul Hamid for the State. Muhammad Ayub petitioner stands charged under Article 10/18 of the Offence of Zina (E.O.H.) Ordinance, 1979, on the allegation that he took Mst. Aisha to his house for committing Zina‑bil‑jabr with her but on account of timely arrival of her parents could not succeed.

2. It is contended that the case is based on absolutely false allegations and that neither' rape was committed on her nor was any attempt made to do so. Her father had tiled an affidavit before the Court stating that he had forgiven the petitioner. The petitioner is behind the bars since about 7‑1/2 months.

3. In the circumstances narrated above I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Gujrat. SA./M‑1588/L Bail granted.