YLR 2006

2006 PLP 2896 (YLR)

MUHAMMAD SADIQ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. MULTAN and 2 others — Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Writ Petition No.5049 of 2005, decided on 26th August, 2005.
Honorable Judges
Muhammad Jehangir Arshad, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2006 PLP 2896 (YLR)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Muhammad Jehangir Arshad, J
Parties MUHAMMAD SADIQ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. MULTAN and 2 others — Respondents
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 2896 (YLR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 2896 (YLR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Jehangir Arshad, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 2896 (YLR) (MUHAMMAD SADIQ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus S.H.O. MULTAN and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Malik Muhammad Tariq Rajwana for Petitioner.

Headnotes / Summary

Ss. 22-A & 22-B

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199

Constitutional petition

Disregard of the orders of the Justice of Peace by police

Effect

Police had disregarded the orders of the Additional Sessions Judge as Justice of Peace on one excuse or the other

Such conduct of the S.H.O. was also violative of judgment of High Court (PLD 2005 Lah.470), for which he could be hauled up for non-compliance

However, taking - a lenient view High Court had referred the matter to the District Police Officer concerned for looking into the same and passing an appropriate order

S.H.O. in the meanwhile was given a last opportunity to comply with the aforesaid orders of the Justice of Peace within two days positively

Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly. Khizar Hayat's case PLD 2005 Lah 470 ref. Malik M. Ramzan Khalid, A.A.-G. along with Ishtiaq Ahmad Gill, Inspector/S.H.O. and Zafar Sial, S.-I.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR ARSHAD, J.

The conduct of S.H.O. present in Court is not up to mark as despite the orders of learned Additional Sessions Judge as Justice of Peace dated 6-7-2005 and 13-7-2005 he has been disregarding the said orders for one excuse or the other. This conduct of the S.H.O. by not following the directions of the Justice of Peace is also violative of a Full Bench judgment of this Court reported in Khizar Hayat's case (PLD 2005 Lahore 470) for which he can be hauled up for,' non-compliance. However, taking a lenient view the matter is referred to the District Police Officer, Multan who shall look into the same and would pass an appropriate order. In the meanwhile, the S.H.O. is given last opportunity to comply with the aforesaid orders of learned Additional Sessions Judge/Justice of Peace within two days positively, with a compliance report to the Additional Registrar of this Bench.

2. With above observations/directions this writ petition is disposed of. N.H.Q./M-1261/L Order accordingly.