1995 PLP 615 (PLC(CS))
FAZAL AHMED Versus PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION, KARACHI through Chairman
| Citation | 1995 PLP 615 (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh |
| Bench Members | Mushtak Ali Kazi, Appellate Tribunal |
| Parties | FAZAL AHMED Versus PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION, KARACHI through Chairman |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 PLP 615 (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 PLP 615 (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh bench comprising: Mushtak Ali Kazi, Appellate Tribunal.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 PLP 615 (PLC(CS)) (FAZAL AHMED Versus PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION, KARACHI through Chairman). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Date of hearing: 19th April, 1995.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Ss. 25‑A & 38(3‑a)‑‑‑Revision‑‑‑Maintainability‑‑‑Labour Court which had rejected application filed by employee under S. 25‑A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 against his dismissal from service, had stated in its rejection order that order of dismissal of employee was valid and legal and that employee had failed even to point out any illegality regarding his dismissal order‑‑‑Employee in his revision filed before Appellate Tribunal against order of Labour Court had simply stated that Manager of Employer who had dismissed him from service, should be put in jail‑‑‑Employee, had not been able to point out as to why Manager of Employer should be ordered to be put in jail‑‑‑Presumption was that someone had tried to make fool of employee who did not appear to be mentally balanced‑‑‑Revision filed by employee against judgment of Labour Court, was not maintainable. Applicant in person.
Judgment & Decree
Revision Application No. KAR‑173 of 1995, decided on 19th April, 1995. ‑‑‑‑Ss. 25‑A & 38(3‑a)‑‑‑Revision‑‑‑Maintainability‑‑‑Labour Court which had rejected application filed by employee under S. 25‑A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 against his dismissal from service, had stated in its rejection order that order of dismissal of employee was valid and legal and that employee had failed even to point out any illegality regarding his dismissal order‑‑‑Employee in his revision filed before Appellate Tribunal against order of Labour Court had simply stated that Manager of Employer who had dismissed him from service, should be put in jail‑‑‑Employee, had not been able to point out as to why Manager of Employer should be ordered to be put in jail‑‑‑Presumption was that someone had tried to make fool of employee who did not appear to be mentally balanced‑‑‑Revision filed by employee against judgment of Labour Court, was not maintainable. Applicant in person. Date of hearing: 19th April, 1995. Applicant has appeared in this Revision Application in person. He states that he has been dismissed from service by Major Abdul Qayum, Deputy Manager, Security P.N.S.C. and he should be put behind the bars. He has filed this Revision Application against the disposed of case of the Vth Sindh Labour Court, Karachi. The Labour Court rejected the application under section 25‑A of the I.R.O. It has been stated in the order of the Labour Court that the order of dismissal of the applicant appeared to be valid and legal and the applicant had failed even to point out any illegality regarding his termination order. Before this Tribunal also the applicant has not been able to point out why the Major should be ordered to be put in Jail but that is what he wants. He says that this Revision Application has been drafted by one Ahmed Ali Oath Commissioner sitting in the Compound of City Courts, but there is no mention on the application that it was drafted by him. It appears that some one has tried to play foolish games with the applicant who does not appear to be mentally balanced. This application is accordingly dismissed in limine. H.B.T./2462/Lb.S Appeal dismissed.