MLD 2011

2011 PLP 1000 (MLD)

NAZEER MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
2010-June-24
Honorable Judges
N/A
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2011 PLP 1000 (MLD)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members N/A
Parties NAZEER MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2011 PLP 1000 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2011 PLP 1000 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: N/A.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2011 PLP 1000 (MLD) (NAZEER MUHAMMAD and another — Applicants Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 498

Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324/384/448/34

Attempt to commit qatl-e-amd, extortion and house trespassing

Pre-arrest bail, confirmation of

One of accused persons was complainant who had filed F.I.R. against complainant of the case for an incident which occurred on same place and at the same time

Accused persons were admitted to interim pre-arrest bail

Since pre-arrest bail had also been granted to the complainant in the case; and facts of both the cases were identical, pre-arrest bail granted to accused persons, was confirmed by enhancing the solvent surety.

Judgment & Decree

MUHAMMAD ATHAR SAEED, J.

In this case, pre-arrest bail application was filed against the order of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Malir, dated 28-9-2009, in Criminal Bail Application No.532 of 2009, relating to F.I.R. No.406 of 2009, registered with the Police 'Station Shah Latif Town, for the offences under sections, 324/384/448/34, P.P.C. Mr. Mehmood A. Qureshi, the learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicant No.1 Nazeer Ahmed in this case is the complainant who had lodged F.I.R. No.405 of 2009 with Police Station Shah Latif Town against the complainant of this case for an incident which occurred on same place and at same time. He further submits that the Hon'able Supreme Court in its order in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.50-K of 2010, dated 16-6-2010, had upheld the order of this Court on identical facts where position was prima facie clear that incident of both F.I. Rs. took place on same date, time and place and observed that point could be properly thrashed out at the time of trial but presently no exception could be taken with regard to the said position and no tentative findings could be given as to which party is aggressor and therefore, upheld the order of' this Court granting pre-arrest bail to the respondents. I have perused the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and found that facts of the present case are identical to the facts of the case before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. After going through the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the learned A.P.-G. also did not oppose the confirmation of interim bail earlier granted in this case. Interim order dated 5-10-2009 has been passed by this Court wherein the applicants were admitted to interim pre-arrest bail subject to furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.100,000 each and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. Since pre-arrest bail has also been granted to the complainant in this case vide order dated 30-9-2010, in Criminal Bail Application No.1079 of 2009, subject to furnishing solvent surety in the sum of Rs.200,000 and since facts of both the cases are identical, therefore, I will confirm interim pre-arrest bail to the present applicants by enhancing solvent surety from Rs.100,000 to Rs.200,000 each and PR bonds in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court. The Nazir is directed that if surety already furnished by the applicants is enough for the quantum of fresh surety then the applicants will remain on same surety but PR bonds in the sum of Rs.200,000 each be taken. In the above terms, this Criminal Bail Application stands disposed of. H.B.T./N-8/K Bail confirmed.