2007 PLP 1930 (SCMR)
ALLAHDINO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 1930 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Rana Bhagwandas and Syed Deedar Hussain Shah, JJ |
| Parties | ALLAHDINO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 1930 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 1930 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Rana Bhagwandas and Syed Deedar Hussain Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 1930 (SCMR) (ALLAHDINO — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ghulam Qadir Jatoi, Advocate-on-Record/Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 28th April, 2003.
- Suleman Habibullah, Additional Advocate-General, Sindh for the State.
- IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.--- Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he had instructions not to press this petition because in view of the progress, which has been made in the case before the trial Court, the petitioner contemplates to repeat bail application for his release on bail. However, he sought indulgence of this Court that if such application is moved, that may be disposed of by the trial Court independently without being influenced by the earlier order. Learned Additional Advocate-General has no objection for making such observations.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from order, of High Court, Sindh, Bench at Sukkur dated 13-9-2002 passed in Criminal Bail Application No.444 of 2002).
S. 497
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)
Petition for bail had been dismissed as not pressed, however, on the request of accused it was observed that if he, subject to availability of the fresh grounds, would approach Trial Court for release on bail, said application would be disposed of without being influenced, in any manner, from the earlier order. Suleman Habibullah, Additional Advocate-General, Sindh for the State.
Judgment & Decree
IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHRY, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that he had instructions not to press this petition because in view of the progress, which has been made in the case before the trial Court, the petitioner contemplates to repeat bail application for his release on bail. However, he sought indulgence of this Court that if such application is moved, that may be disposed of by the trial Court independently without being influenced by the earlier order. Learned Additional Advocate-General has no objection for making such observations.
2. Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Needless to observe that if the petitioner, subject to availability of the fresh grounds, approaches trial Court for release on bail; such application shall be disposed of without being influenced, in any manner, far the earlier order. N.H.Q./A-62/SC Petition dismissed.