CLC 1981

1981 CLC907 (PLP)

Mst. MANZOOR ZOHRAN‑‑Petitioner Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Writ Petition No. 2652 of 1975, decided on 28th February, 1981.
Honorable Judges
Abaid Ullah Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1981 CLC907 (PLP)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Abaid Ullah Khan, J
Parties Mst. MANZOOR ZOHRAN‑‑Petitioner Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 CLC907 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 CLC907 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Abaid Ullah Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 CLC907 (PLP) (Mst. MANZOOR ZOHRAN‑‑Petitioner Versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

Representation

  • Syed Shamim Abbas Bokhari for Petitioner.
  • Ch. Muhammad Abdus Salim for Respondents.
  • Date of hearing : 28th February, 1981.

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑ Art. 199‑Writ jurisdictionFinding of fact‑‑Lower Courts con cluding as to petitioner having not succeeded to prove repudiation of marriage before attaining age of 18 years‑Petitioner not showing any legal flaw in finding of fact on point‑Held, High Court in writ jurisdiction cannot substitute its own finding for finding of fact given by Court of competent jurisdiction.

Judgment & Decree

MANZOOR HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents Writ Petition No. 2652 of 1975, decided on 28th February, 1981. ‑‑ Art. 199‑Writ jurisdictionFinding of fact‑‑Lower Courts con cluding as to petitioner having not succeeded to prove repudiation of marriage before attaining age of 18 years‑Petitioner not showing any legal flaw in finding of fact on point‑Held, High Court in writ jurisdiction cannot substitute its own finding for finding of fact given by Court of competent jurisdiction. Syed Shamim Abbas Bokhari for Petitioner. Ch. Muhammad Abdus Salim for Respondents. Date of hearing : 28th February, 1981.