1986 PLP 1834 (SCMR)
ATTAULLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus JAWAID HAIDER KAZMI and 2 others — Respondents
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1834 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah, S. A. Nusrat and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ |
| Parties | ATTAULLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus JAWAID HAIDER KAZMI and 2 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1834 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1834 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah, S. A. Nusrat and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1834 (SCMR) (ATTAULLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus JAWAID HAIDER KAZMI and 2 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Date of hearing: 25th August, 1986.
- After hearing the petitioner who is an Advocate in person and respondent No. l who is also an Advocate, we are satisfied that the impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity, legal or otherwise.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order of the Sind High Court, Karachi, dated 13-4-1986, passed in Bail Applications Nos. 312 of 1986 and 365 of 1986).
S. 497(5)--Cancellation of bail--Bail granting order passed by High Court not suffering from any infirmity, legal or otherwise--Leave to appeal against said order refused. Petitioner in person. Respondent No. l in person.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought from order dated 13‑4‑1986 of the Sind High Court whereby anticipatory bail was allowed to respondents Nos.1 and 2 in a 307, P.P.C. case. The petitioner who is the complainant in the case seeks cancellation of the bail. After hearing the petitioner who is an Advocate in person and respondent No. l who is also an Advocate, we are satisfied that the impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity, legal or otherwise. No justification has been made out for grant of leave to appeal. This petition accordingly, is dismissed. M . Y . H . Petition dismissed.