2006 PLP 2452 (PTD)
Messrs IFTIKHAR BROTHERS, CIVIL QUARTERS ROAD, SHEIKHUPURA Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, ISLAMABAD and another
| Citation | 2006 PLP 2452 (PTD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Sikandar and Sh. Azmat Saeed, JJ |
| Parties | Messrs IFTIKHAR BROTHERS, CIVIL QUARTERS ROAD, SHEIKHUPURA Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, ISLAMABAD and another |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 2452 (PTD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 2452 (PTD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Nasim Sikandar and Sh. Azmat Saeed, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 2452 (PTD) (Messrs IFTIKHAR BROTHERS, CIVIL QUARTERS ROAD, SHEIKHUPURA Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, ISLAMABAD and another). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Nemo for Petitioner.
- Muhammad Ilyas Khan for Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM SIKANDAR, J.
Learned counsel appearing for the revenue states and I will agree that the issues in hand already stand resolved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan earlier raised in identical Civil Petitions 1962 to 2205 of 2005.
2. The operative part of the order of Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan, dated 1st March, 2006 reads as under:-- "In view of the above arrangement between the parties, the appeals are disposed of with consent, consequently, the portions of impugned judgment reproduced hereinabove are deleted with the observation that let appellants issue fresh notices to the respondents in terms of section 177 of the Ordinance, as it was prevailing at the relevant time, disclosing criteria/reasons for selecting their cases for purpose of audit. As far as the cases in respect whereof observations have been made hereinabove relating to Circular C. No.1(1)s (ITAS) 2004 or otherwise if the returns have been revised and payment has been made by the assessee, no further action shall be taken against them. The parties are left to bear their own costs."
3. Learned counsel agrees that the petition in hand needs to be disposed of in the light of the observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as reproduced above. Order accordingly.