1994 PLP 552 (SCMR)
Dr. MUKHTAR AHMAD DODHY‑‑‑Appellant Versus Sh. ZAHEER AHMAD and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1994 PLP 552 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Abdul Shakurul Salam and Muhammad Afzal Lone, JJ |
| Parties | Dr. MUKHTAR AHMAD DODHY‑‑‑Appellant Versus Sh. ZAHEER AHMAD and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 552 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 552 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Abdul Shakurul Salam and Muhammad Afzal Lone, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 552 (SCMR) (Dr. MUKHTAR AHMAD DODHY‑‑‑Appellant Versus Sh. ZAHEER AHMAD and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Maqbool Elahi Malik, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Kh. Mushtaq Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Appellant.
- K.MA. Samdani, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by M Aslam Ch., Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 8th December, 1991.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 7‑4‑1990 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in W.P. No. 5967 of 1989). ‑‑‑‑S. 13‑‑‑Ejectment order against tenant‑‑‑Tenant expressing his willingness to vacate premises in question, provided he was given time up to specified date‑‑‑Such offer was accepted by landlord‑‑‑Appeal was disposed of by Supreme Court with direction that tenant would hand over vacant possession of premises in question, to landlord before or on specified date and till then would pay the usual rent‑‑‑Tenant, in case of default, would be ejected straightaway and would be liable for other legal consequences.
Judgment & Decree
ABDUL SHAKURUL SALAM, J.‑‑‑In this appeal by leave the appellant who is a qualified doctor has been ordered to be ejected from Shop No.3, 30, Commercial Zone, Liberty Market, Lahore where he has been running a Clinic for the last 20 years.
1. Learned counsel for the appellant who is accompanied by the appellant states that the appellant shall vacate the premises provided he is Oven time until 11th September, 1992. This offer is acceptable to the learned counsel for the respondents who is accompanied by the respondent No.l.
2. In view of the above; this appeal is disposed of with the direction that the appellant shall hand over vacant possession of the shop in question to the respondents before or by 11th September, 1992 and till then shall pay the usual rent. In case of default, the appellant shall be ejected straightaway and shall be liable for other legal consequences. AA./M‑1849/S Order accordingly.