2002 PLP 872 (CLD)
| Citation | 2002 PLP 872 (CLD) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Mushir Alam, J |
| Parties | |
| Primary Law | Companies Ordinance (RLVII of 1984)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 872 (CLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Companies Ordinance (RLVII of 1984)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 872 (CLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Mushir Alam, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 872 (CLD) (). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Agha Zafar Ali for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 28th February, 2001.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Ss.284, 287 & 288‑‑‑Petition for merger and amalgamation of companies‑‑‑Members of both companies by majority had approved resolution of merger/ amalgamation of both companies and neither employees nor any of the creditors had come forward to oppose scheme of amalgamation‑‑‑Both companies had disclosed their latest financial position‑‑‑Apparently nothing in proposed ‑‑theme ran contrary to Companies Ordinance, 1984‑‑‑Merger/Amalgamation, in circumstances, would be in the interest of shareholders of both the companies, particularly when no material was on record ‑to suggest that merger/ amalgamation of the two companies would be against public interest or in violation of any law-- Amalgamation/merger scheme was sanctioned and as required under S.287 of Companies Ordinance, 1984 orders were passed accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
On C.M.A. No. 1567 of 2000, separate meeting of the members of both the petitioners was ordered to be held to consider, aid if thought fit, approve, adopt and agree to the proposed scheme of merger/ amalgamation Annexure `A' to the petition. Such meetings were held by each of the petitioners on 30‑12‑2000, whereby members of petitioner No.1, representing 77.51% in value of share held by members present in person or by proxy, approved the scheme and likewise members of petitioner No.2 representing 82.45% in value of share held by members in person or by proxy approved the scheme. Report of such meeting were filed in Court on 19‑2‑2001. Comments of the Registrar of Joint Stock Companies are also on record. There is no opposition to the grant of petition. I have perused the proposed scheme of amalgamation. Members of both the Companies have by majority approved the resolution of the amalgamation/ merger. Neither the employees nor any of the creditors have come forward to oppose the scheme. Both the companies have disclosed their latest financial position. Apparently, nothing in the proposed scheme runs contrary to the Companies Ordinance, 1984. In this view of the matter merger/ amalgamation would be in the interest of shareholders of both the Companies. There is no material on ‑record to suggest that the merger would be against public interest or in violation of any law. The petition is therefore, allowed amalgamation Merger Scheme (Annexure `A' to the petition) is sanctioned; consequently Messrs R.R.P. Ltd., petitioner No. l will stand merged/ amalgamated with Messrs Nimir Resins Limited, petitioner No.2 as on the date of which the copy of the order of Court sanctioning the scheme is filed with the Registrar of Companies both, at Karachi and . Lahore in terms of clause 18 of the Scheme. Consequently, as required under section 287 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 following orders are' passed so as to take effect at the same time as this order sanctioning the scheme of arrangement take effect in accordance with provisions of section 284(3) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984:‑‑ (9) Transferring to and vesting in the Messrs Nimir Resins Ltd. (petitioner No.2) the whole of the undertaking of Messrs R.R.L. (petitioner No. l) together with all its properties, assets, rights, liabilities, and obligation of every description including those specifically, described in paragraph 2 of the scheme of arrangement dated 10‑11‑1999, Annexure `A' to the petition. (ii) Continuation by the petitioner No.2 of all legal proceedings instituted by or against the petitioner No. l that may be pending as on the date of sanction of scheme of amalgamation. (iii) Petitioner No.2 is directed to issue /allot 1(one) ordinary share of petitioner No.2 of the nominal value of Re. 10 each credited as fully paid‑up in petitioner No.2 for each 1(one) ordinary share of the nominal value of Re. 10 each credited as fully paid up in the petitioner No. l to the registered shareholders of those shares in the petitioner No.
1. The determination of the registered shareholders of share in petitioner No.1 and the respective entitlement of such ordinary share of petitioner No.2 the treatment of fractional entitlement and allotment of such share and delivery of share certificate by the petitioner No.2 shall be in accordance with paragraph 4 of the scheme (Annexure `A' to the petition), and that for this purpose the register of members of the petitioner No.1 shall be closed for a period of seven days prior to and inclusive of the date fixed by the directors of petitioner No.2 by reference to which the Registered shareholder of the ordinary share of the petitioner No. l are to be determined for entitlement to ordinary share of the petitioner No.2 and that the notice of such closure to be published not less than 7 (seven) days prior to such closure in at least one issue each daily newspaper in English and Urdu language respectively having circulation the Province of Sindh and Punjab both. (iv) The petitioner No.1 shall stand dissolved, without winding up, on the date on which the ordinary shares of the petitioner No.2 are allotted to the holders of the ordinary shares of petitioner No.1 in accordance with the scheme of amalgamation as set forth in Annexure `A' to the petition. The petition in terms stated above stand allowed. H. B.T. / I‑52 / K Petition accepted.