2010 PLP 2421(1) (YLR)
ATIQ-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus Mst. RANI and 7 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2010 PLP 2421(1) (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Sarmad Jalal Osmany and Tufail H. Ebrahim, JJ |
| Parties | ATIQ-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus Mst. RANI and 7 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Penal Code (XLV of 1860) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 2421(1) (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Penal Code (XLV of 1860) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 2421(1) (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Sarmad Jalal Osmany and Tufail H. Ebrahim, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 2421(1) (YLR) (ATIQ-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus Mst. RANI and 7 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sathi M. Ishaq for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 406
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199
Constitutional petition
Both the parties had filed civil suits against each other which were pending in civil court
Proceedings lodged by the parties against each other should await the decision of civil suits
High Court directed that petitioner shall not create any third party interest in the properties in question till the decision of the civil suits. Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 in person. Adnan Karim Memon, A.A.-G.
Judgment & Decree
We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.A.-G. as well as respondents Nos. 1 and
2. We have also perused the report submitted by Mr. Ghulam Nabi Memon, DIG., Headquarters, Sindh. According to the Report the properties in question were purchased by Mst. Rani and while she was residing in Dubai, petitioner Atiqur Rehman by fraudulent means transferred the ownership of the said properties in his name. Thereafter Mst. Rani shifted to Pakistan and lodged a criminal case against Atiqur Rehman, who in retaliation also got registered a criminal case against her and her family. Mr. Sathi says that both the parties have also filed civil suits against each other and the same are pending in Civil Court, Karachi. He further says that this is a civil matter and pending decision of the same, the criminal proceedings lodged by the parties against each other may be stopped. Learned A.A.-G. as well as respondents Nos. 1 and 2 have no objection. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.A.-G. as well as respondents Nos. 1 and
2. We have also perused the report of the D.I.G. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the opinion that the proceedings lodged by the parties against each other should await the decision of the civil suits. Order accordingly. The petitioner shall not create any third party interest in the properties in question till the decision of the civil suits. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. H.B.T./A-56/K Order accordingly.