1986 PLP 1825(2) (SCMR)
GUL KHAN and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1825(2) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Haleem, C.J., S.A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | GUL KHAN and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1825(2) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1825(2) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, C.J., S.A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1825(2) (SCMR) (GUL KHAN and 2 others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Muhammad Hayat Junejo, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Muzaffar Hussain Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners.
- Date of hearing: 12th August, 1986.
- Muhammad Hayat Junejo, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Muzaffar Hussain Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Sattar A. Shaikh, Additional Advocate‑General instructed by M.A.I. Qarni, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Sind Sukkur Bench, dated 16-6-1986, passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 297 of 1986).
Art. 185(3)--Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), 5.497, proviso fourth--Interpretation of--Conflict of view--Leave to appeal granted to resolve conflict of opinion as to interpretation of fourth proviso to 5.497, Cr.P.C. Rahim Bux and others v. The State P L D 1986 Kar. 224 ref. Sattar A. Shaikh, Additional Advocate-General instructed by M.A.I. Qarni, Advocate-on-Record for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.‑‑There is a conflict of opinion in the High Court as to the interpretation of the fourth proviso of section 497, Cr.P.C. The learned Single Judge while deciding Bail Application No. 297 of 1986 out of which this petition has arisen, has not accepted the view expressed by another learned Single Judge in the case reported as Rahim Bux and others v. The State P L D 1986 Kar.
224. Accordingly we would grant leave to appeal to resolve this conflict. The appeal shall be made ready for hearing in September, 1986, if possible. M. I. Leave granted.