2006 PLP 387 (YLR)
AKHUND JAWAID AKHTAR SIDDIQUI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2006 PLP 387 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Anwar Zaheer Jamali, J |
| Parties | AKHUND JAWAID AKHTAR SIDDIQUI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 7898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2006 PLP 387 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 7898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2006 PLP 387 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Anwar Zaheer Jamali, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2006 PLP 387 (YLR) (AKHUND JAWAID AKHTAR SIDDIQUI — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S.498
Protective bail, grant of--Accused before approaching the High Court for grant of pre-arrest bail had moved the Trial Court for grant of pre-arrest bail, but neither pre-arrest bail had been allowed to him by Trial Court nor his application had been disposed of on merits
Accused was apprehending his arrest at the hands of police which would frustrate efforts of grant of pre-arrest bail
In order to do justice, till pre-arrest bail was decided by Trial Court, he was admitted to interim pre-arrest bail without touching the merits of the case
Pre-arrest bail application was disposed of in the terms that accused was admitted to protective bail for a period of 7 days. Syed Madad Ali Shah for Applicant. Anwar H. Ansari for the State Counsel.
Judgment & Decree
ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, J.--The application under section 498, Cr.P.C. has been moved by the applicant for seeking pre-arrest bail in Crime No.15 of 2005 Police Station Sekhat District, Matiari, which relates to an incident occurred on 26-8-2005. At the outset it has been stated by the learned counsel for the applicant that before approaching this Court the applicant has moved the trial Court on 10-9-2005 for grant of pre-arrest bail to him but till this date neither interim pre-arrest bail has been allowed nor the said application has been disposed of by the trial Court on merits. He A contended that in the given facts and circumstances of the present case applicant is apprehending his arrest at the hands of police which will frustrate his efforts for grant of pre-arrest bail in the case, though such application is pending before the trial Court. Learned counsel, therefore, submitted that in order to do justice with the applicant, till his pre-arrest bail is decided by the trial Court, he may be admitted to interim pre-arrest bail without touching the merits of the case. Mr. Anwar H. Ansari learned State counsel has not seriously opposed such request. In view of the above, without touching the merits of the case, this pre-arrest bail application is disposed of in the terms that the applicant is admitted to protective bail for a period of 7 days from today on his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of Additional Registrar of this Court. It is excepted that in the meantime the trial Court will hear and disposed of the bail application of the applicant, which is stated to be now fixed on 8-10-2005. In case the applicant fails to appear before the trial Court, the surety furnished by him shall stand forfeited. H.B.T./A-274/K????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.