1985 PLP 358 (MLD)
BHOOR MAL and others — Appellants Versus Mst. SAKINA BIBI and others — Respondents
| Citation | 1985 PLP 358 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | BHOOR MAL and others — Appellants Versus Mst. SAKINA BIBI and others — Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 358 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 358 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 358 (MLD) (BHOOR MAL and others — Appellants Versus Mst. SAKINA BIBI and others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- ---S. 100--Second appeal--Trial Court failing to record findings on specified issues after order of remand--Respondent's counsel in statement before Court admitting that no finding having been recorded on specified issues, respondent would have no objection if judgments of trial court as well as of First Appellate Court be set aside--That case be remanded to trial Court for re-writing judgment after giving findings on specified issues--Appellant's counsel having no objection to disposal of appeal in light of statement of counsel for respondents--Appeal was disposed of in accordance with statements of counsel.
- Ch. Abdul Rehman for Respondents.
- 3. At this stage Ch. Abdul Rehman, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and wants to make a statement. Let his statement be recorded.
- Statement of Ch. Abdul Rehman, Advocate, counsel for the Respondents.
Judgment & Decree
Appellants' contention inter alia that the learned trial Court has failed to record its findings on issues Nos. 5 and 6 after the original order of remand, dated 3-7-1978 was reviewed on 9-5-1979 requires further examination.
2. Admit. Notice.
3. At this stage Ch. Abdul Rehman, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and wants to make a statement. Let his statement be recorded. Statement of Ch. Abdul Rehman, Advocate, counsel for the Respondents. After going through the judgment of the learned trial Court, dated 16-5-1984 it has been found that the view taken by the learned trial Judge that findings on issues Nos. 5 and 6 have already been confirmed is net correct as, according to the order, dated 8-5-1979 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, the trial Court had to record its findings on these issues as well. Under the circumstance the respondents have no objection if the judgment of the learned trial Court and that of the appellate Court be set aside and the case remanded to the learned trial Court for re-writing the Judgment after giving findings on issues Nos. 4, 5 and
6. The parties should be allowed to address arguments before the learned trial Court on the aforementioned issues. R.O.&.A.C. Dated 18-2-1985. Presence as before. Statement of learned counsel for the respondents has been recorded. Learned counsel for the appellants has no objection to the disposal of this appeal in the light of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents. The appeal has been accordingly disposed of through a separate order. A.A. Order accordingly.