1987 PLP 1422 (SCMR)
SH. JAFFAR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus AMIR ALI and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1987 PLP 1422 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain; Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | SH. JAFFAR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus AMIR ALI and another‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP 1422 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP 1422 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain; Javid Iqbal and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP 1422 (SCMR) (SH. JAFFAR HUSSAIN‑‑Petitioner Versus AMIR ALI and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 467 of 1980) .
- Altaf Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Ejaz Ali Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.505 of 1980) .
- Nemo for Respondent (in Crl. P.S.L.A. No.505 of 1980).
- Date of hearing: 25th May, 1987.
- Altaf Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State (in Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 467 of 1980).
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore dated 9‑7‑1980 passed in State Appeal No.1145 of 1979). (a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 302/34‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Petition against acquittal and alteration of conviction‑‑Parties having compromised between themselves, prayer for withdrawal of case allowed and petition dismissed as withdrawn. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)‑‑ ‑‑‑S. 302/34‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)‑‑Petition against acquittal and alteration of conviction‑‑No flaw having been pointed out in impugned judgment, leave to appeal refused. Altaf Muhammad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for the State (in Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 467 of 1980).
Judgment & Decree
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑ This order will dispose of (i) Crl. PSLA No. 467/80 filed by Sh. Jaffar Hussain complainant against the outright acquittal of Amir Ali and alteration of the conviction of Zulfiqar from section 302, PPC to under section 304‑II, PPC, and (ii) Cr.P.505/80 filed by the state for the same purpose.
2. Learned AOR for the petitioner in Cr. PSLA No.467/80 submits that the parties have arrived at a compromise between themselves and as such he has instructions not to press the petition and to withdraw the same. This petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn.
3. We have heard the learned State counsel with regard to Crl. P. No. 505/80 and have gone through the impugned judgment of the High Court. He has not been able to point out any flaw in the impugned judgment. This petition is, therefore, also dismissed. M.I./J‑9/S Petition dismissed.