1984 PLP 1504 (PLC(CS))
INAYATULLAH ROCKET Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, UTILITY STORES CORPORATION,
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1504 (PLC(CS)) |
| Forum / Court | Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal |
| Parties | INAYATULLAH ROCKET Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, UTILITY STORES CORPORATION, |
| Primary Law | Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1504 (PLC(CS))?
This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1504 (PLC(CS))?
The case was heard and decided by the Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab bench comprising: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1504 (PLC(CS)) (INAYATULLAH ROCKET Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, UTILITY STORES CORPORATION,). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ehsan Ali Sheikh for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 22nd May, 1984.
Headnotes / Summary
S.8-A-Stay application, grant of-Employee, President of Union, transferred to other station without getting permission from Registrar with whom application for registration of Union pending and thus would not be able to pursue application effectively-Such employee on election of new President would be suffering loss in terms of money, thus balance of convenience was in his favour-Employee, held, has a prima facie case for grant of stay Order of dismissal of stay application set aside. Petitioner in person.
Judgment & Decree
S.8-A-Stay application, grant of-Employee, President of Union, transferred to other station without getting permission from Registrar with whom application for registration of Union pending and thus would not be able to pursue application effectively-Such employee on election of new President would be suffering loss in terms of money, thus balance of convenience was in his favour-Employee, held, has a prima facie case for grant of stay Order of dismissal of stay application set aside. Petitioner in person. Ehsan Ali Sheikh for Respondents. Date of hearing : 22nd May, 1984. The order, dated 30th January, 1984 whereby the stay application of the petitioner was dismissed is informed to have been wrongly passed. The prayer is that this Tribunal may exercise its suo motu revisional powers to set aside the impugned order. 2. The petitioner was transferred to Lahore vide order, dated 15th December, 1983 without getting permission from the Registrar with whom the application of the petitioner for the registration of the Union of which he is alleged to be the President, is alleged to be pending. Information o it is alleged to have been given to the respondents on 10th December, 1983 vide letter copy marked `B'. The copy of the application for registration of the Union is marked `A'. These documents show that the petitioner has a prima facie case. Getting of permission from the Registrar is necessary A according to section 8-A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Balance of convenience also goes in favour of the petitioner and the Union. If transfer is not stayed, the petitioner will not be able to pursue the application for registration of the Union effectively. He shall have to go to Faisalabad to pursue the application. If on account of his transfer another President is elected, the petitioner will cease to remain as President and thus will suffer a loss that cannot be compensated in terms of money. He thus has 3. As a result, the impugned order dismissing the stay application is, set aside and implementation of the transfer order is stayed. If it has been implemented, its operation is suspended with a direction that the petitioner should be put back on duty at Faisalabad. This order will remain effective till the final decision of the main grievance petition pending before the learned lower Court. M. Y. M. Petition allowed.