1989 PLP 1739 (SCMR)
ARSHAD MAHMOOD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MAQBOOL AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1739 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah arid Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | ARSHAD MAHMOOD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MAQBOOL AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1739 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1739 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah arid Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1739 (SCMR) (ARSHAD MAHMOOD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus MAQBOOL AHMAD and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Anwar Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mchtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Karamat Nazir Bhinder, Advocate Supreme Court and Rana M.A. Kadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent :
- Date of hearing: 3rd September, 1988.
- MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Learned counsel for the parties state that the subject‑matter of this appeal has been settled out of the Court through a compromise. They have also prayed that this appeal may be disposed of in terms of the compromise. The compormise decd produced in the Court which is duly signed by both the Advocate on‑Record, reads as follows‑
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, dated 24‑2‑1982 in W.P. 237 of 1982). ‑‑‑Art.l85(3)‑‑Compromise‑‑Request of disposal of appeal in terms of compromise deed was allowed and appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Learned counsel for the parties state that the subject‑matter of this appeal has been settled out of the Court through a compromise. They have also prayed that this appeal may be disposed of in terms of the compromise. The compormise decd produced in the Court which is duly signed by both the Advocate on‑Record, reads as follows‑ "(1) The parties in the above appeal have compromised the cause in the following terms. The compromise may be recorded and appeal disposed of accordingly. (2) The terms of the Compromise are:‑ "The sale price of Rs.15,000 as recorded in the decree of the Trial Court may be enhanced to Rs.25,
000. Respondent No.1‑‑pre‑emptor decree holder be allowed a time of one month from today to deposit the additional amount of Rs.10,000 in the Trial Court in the name of the Vendees. The decree of the Trial Court in all other respects shall stand intact. In default, the trial Court decree shall be set aside." In the circumstances of this case, the request for disposal of the appeal in terms of the Compromise Deed is allowed. The appeal is also allowed in terms of 10, the afore‑recorded compromise. There shall be no order as to costs. M.A.K./A‑517/S Order accordingly.