2002 PLP 635 (YLR)
Syed KHALID HASSAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2002 PLP 635 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Ashraf Leghari, J |
| Parties | Syed KHALID HASSAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2002 PLP 635 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2002 PLP 635 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Muhammad Ashraf Leghari, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2002 PLP 635 (YLR) (Syed KHALID HASSAN — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.420 & 465
Complainant had filed affidavit wherein he had exonerated the accused
Police had not collected any further evidence to show that accused had forged documents
Offence against accused under S.420, P. P. C. was bailable and remaining offences against accused were non cognizable
In absence of reasonable grounds to believe that accused was guilty of offence with which he was charged, he was admitted to bail. Mehmood A. Qureshi for Applicant. Habib Ahmed, A.A.-G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Mehmood A. Qureshi for Applicant. Habib Ahmed, A.A.-G. for the State. Saddar police received a written complaint through Inspector Suleman Abro. Of Crime Branch for investigation of the case which was incorporated in 154, Cr.P.C. book. The perusal of which reveals that Abdul Qadir Jaferi Honourary Consulate for Brazil 113/A Sindhi Muslim Cooperative Houssing Society, Shahra-e-Faisal, P.O. Box 7482 Karachi, has stated that some documents including passport profit; visa, income tax papers and air ticket were submitted before him by one Syed Khalid Hussain for issuance of tourist visa out of which on verification, income tax documents were found to be forged. The investigation was carried out after registration of F.I.R. and applicant was arrested on 8-3-2000. It is contended by Mr. Mehmood A. Qureshi learned counsel for applicant that the complainant in this case has filed an affidavit wherein he has exonerated the present applicant and has stated that he is also a victim himself and was cheated by Waqar Aziz recruiting agent. The complainant has further stated in his affidavit that he has conveyed such information to I.-G., Police, Sindh in respect of his innocence. It is argued that section 420 is bailable whereas the remaining sections are, non-cognizable. It is argued that the offence contained in F.I.R. do not come under .the prohibitory clause of section 497(1), Cr.P.C. Mr. Habib Ahmed learned A.A.-G has conceded to the grant of bail on the ground that offences are not covered by prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. and that the complainant himself has exonerated the applicant by filing his affidavit. It is argued that the police has not collected any further evidence to show that applicant had forged the said documents. Learned A.A.-G is not able to point out as to who has forged the income tax documents. The offence with which accused is charged is not covered by prohibitory clause of section 497; Cr.P.C. section 420 is bailable and the remaining sections are non cognizable. The complainant has filed his affidavit wherein he has exonerated the present applicant and has stated that he himself is victim and has been cheated by the travelling agent. Under these circumstances, at this stage there do not appear reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant is guilty of the offence with which he has been charged. The accused is, therefore, granted bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. H.B.T./K-62/K Bail granted.