1990 PLP 1815 (MLD)
MUHAMMAD HAYAT‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, OKARA and 2 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 1815 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ihsan‑ul‑Haq Chaudhry, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD HAYAT‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, OKARA and 2 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 1815 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 1815 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ihsan‑ul‑Haq Chaudhry, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 1815 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD HAYAT‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, OKARA and 2 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Mirza Muhammad Rashid Ahmad Raza for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Art.199‑‑‑Constitutional petition praying for extension of time fixed by High Court for the disposal of guardian application‑‑‑More than a month was at the disposal of Guardian Judge to decide the application and there seemed to be no genuine difficulty in deciding the application in accordance with the time fixed by High Court specially when the Court had been permitted to hold day‑to‑day proceedings‑‑‑Constitutional petition being utterly misconceived and petitioner having no locus standi to seek extension of time was dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑Art.199‑‑‑Constitutional petition praying for extension of time fixed by High Court for the disposal of guardian application‑‑‑More than a month was at the disposal of Guardian Judge to decide the application and there seemed to be no genuine difficulty in deciding the application in accordance with the time fixed by High Court specially when the Court had been permitted to hold day‑to‑day proceedings‑‑‑Constitutional petition being utterly misconceived and petitioner having no locus standi to seek extension of time was dismissed. Mirza Muhammad Rashid Ahmad Raza for Petitioner. The petitioner through this application has prayed for extension of time fixed by this Court for the disposal of the guardian application.
2. The relevant facts are that the petitioner filed a Constitutional petition against the order of the learned Guardian Judge and the lower appellate Court. The same was allowed on a technical ground and learned Guardian Judge was directed to decide the guardian petition expeditiously and in any case before 30‑6 1990. The petitioner has now applied for extension of its time.
3. The petition is utterly misconceived. The petitioner has no locus standi to seek extension. Still more than a month is at the disposal of the learned Guardian Judge to decide the petition and there seems to be no genuine difficulty in deciding the petition in accordance with the time limit fixed by this Court especially when he had beef permitted to hold day‑to‑day proceedings.
4. In this view of the matter, the petition is dismissed. A copy to be sent to the learned Guardian Judge M.B.A./M‑2106/1 Petition dismissed