1989 PLP 1941(1) (SCMR)
SARDAR MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HAFIZ and another‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 1941(1) (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | SARDAR MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HAFIZ and another‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 19(7)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1941(1) (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 19(7)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1941(1) (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1941(1) (SCMR) (SARDAR MUHAMMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD HAFIZ and another‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 25th March, 1989.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 7th May, 1985 of the Lahore High Court, in Writ Petition No. 1858 of 1985). ‑‑‑S.36‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.185(3) & 199‑Lambardar, appointment of‑‑Supreme Court after examining the merits of case found that High Court had rightly declined to exercise writ jurisdiction in Lambardari case‑ View of High Court got support from Sharaf Din v. Qazi Abdul Jalil and another 1986 S C M R 1368 and several other judgments of the Supreme Court‑‑Leave to appeal refused. Sharaf Din v. Qazi Abdul Jalil and another 1986 S C M R 1368 rel.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Learned counsel is absent. The learned A.O.R. states that he has no authority from the learned counsel to argue the case. We have ourselves examined the merits. The question agitated before the High Court in its writ jurisdiction related to the appointment of a Lambardar. The learned Judge has rightly declined to exercise the writ jurisdiction in the as Lambardari case. His view gets support from Sharaf Din v Qazi Abdul Jalil and another (1986 S C M R 1368) and several other judgments of this case. Leave to ‑appeal, accordingly, is refused. M.A.K./S‑414/S Leave refused.