2007 PLP 2374 (YLR)
SUHRAB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 2374 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Khilji Arif Hussain, J |
| Parties | SUHRAB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 2374 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 2374 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Khilji Arif Hussain, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 2374 (YLR) (SUHRAB — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
? S. 497(2)
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.302, 459, 148 & 149
Only the presence of accused had been alleged at the time of occurrence and no overt act had been attributed to him
F.I.R. though had alleged that accused was present along with K.K. on the spot, but it had not been mentioned that he took part or fired at any one of the complainant party
No allegation having been made that accused had taken part in the offence or any overt act had been alleged against him, case against accused required further inquiry--Accused was granted bail, in circumstances. Jai Jai Veshno Mange Ram for Applicant. M. Ismail Bhutto for the State.
Judgment & Decree
KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN, J.
This bail application has been filed by Sohrab, accused in Crime No.19 of 2003 registered at Police Station, Khanpur for offence under sections 302, 459, 148 and 149, P.P.C. On the perusal of F.I.R. it appears that only presence of the accused has been alleged whereas no overt act has been attributed to him. In the F.I.R. though it has been alleged that the applicant was present along with K.K on the spot but it has not been alleged that he took part or E fired upon any of the complainant party. Since no allegation has been made that the applicant has taken part in the offence or any over act has been alleged against him the case requires further enquiry. Accordingly applicant is granted bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.200,000 as P.R. bond in the like-:.amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./S-48/K???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.