1989SCMR1141 (PLP)
Rana BASHIR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, EXCISE & TAXATION PUNJAB, LAHORE and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989SCMR1141 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Saad Saood Jan and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ |
| Parties | Rana BASHIR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, EXCISE & TAXATION PUNJAB, LAHORE and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989SCMR1141 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989SCMR1141 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Saad Saood Jan and Ali Hussain Qazilbash, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989SCMR1141 (PLP) (Rana BASHIR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus THE DIRECTOR‑GENERAL, EXCISE & TAXATION PUNJAB, LAHORE and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Asghar Khadim, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 9th August, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 3‑8‑1983 of the Punjab Service, Tribunal in Appeal No.504 of 1982). ‑‑‑Rr.5 & 6‑‑Removal from service During the course of another departmental inquiry it was found that civil servant had tampered with the official record was thus served with a fresh charge‑sheet and proceeded against under to Rules, 1975‑‑After a regular inquiry, in which civil servant also participated charges against him were found to be established and he was served with a cause notice and after being given a hearing he was removed from service A: against the civil servant, held, had been taken strictly in accordance with relevant disciplinary Rules.
Judgment & Decree
SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑The petitioner was Inspector in the Excise aid Taxation Department. During the course of another departmental inquiry it was found that he had tampered with the official record. He was served with a fresh charge sheet and proceeded against under the Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975. After a regular inquiry in which he also participated the charges against him were found to be established. He was served with a show', cause notice and after being given a hearing he was removed from service. VC preferred a departmental appeal but without any success. He then filed an appeal before the Service Tribunal. This too failed. He now seeks leave to appeal from this Court.
2. The action against the petitioner has been taken strictly in accordance with the relevant disciplinary rules. No substantial question of law of public importance arises for our consideration. The petition is dismissed. MBA./B‑93/S Petition dismissed