1995 P Cr (PLP)
MUHAMMAD MUNIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1995 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD MUNIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (c) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1995 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), (c) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1995 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1995 P Cr (PLP) (MUHAMMAD MUNIR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Munir Ahmad Bhatti for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302/34
Fatal injury to the deceased was attributed to accused who was named in the F.I.R. with a specific role
Mere filing of affidavits of certain persons without any corroborative evidence was not sufficient to shake the veracity of the story put by complainant duly supported by eye-witnesses
Record did not support the accused's plea of alibi
Accused having been finally challaned, opinion of Investigating Officer regarding his innocence carried no weight
Brutal murder had been committed in broad daylight
Bail was refused to accused in circumstances.
Ss. 74, 526 & 539-A
Evidentiary value
An affidavit not covered by S. 74, 526 or 539-A, Cr.P.C. is not legal evidence.
[Affidavit].
Art. 163
Applicability of Art 163, Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984 to criminal cases
Procedure of swearing on the Holy Qur'an (oath proceedings) is not applicable in criminal cases.
Judgment & Decree
Muhammad Munir has moved this application under section 497, Cr.P.C. for the grant of post-arrest bail in case registered Vide F.I.R. No.505/94, dated 7-10-1994 under section 302/34, P.P.C. Police Station Shumali Cantt., Lahore. 2., According to F.I.R., the petitioner alongwith co-accused inflicted knife injury on the left side of chest of Zia Ullah who fell down and in the way to hospital succumbed to injuries.
3. In support of the petition learned counsel argued that the S.H.O. of the local police station has declared the petitioner innocent and same finding has been affirmed by the D.S.P. Cantt.; no recovery has been effected from the petitioner and that the petitioner was not present at the spot when the occurrence took place and he was very much on his duty. According to learned counsel the petitioner's case is one of further inquiry.
4. Learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the petition. According to him, in the last investigation conducted by the D.S.P., Cantt. Division; the petitioner has been found guilty and challan has been submitted. He further states that today the case is fixed before the learned Sessions Judge for the entrustment of the same to any learned Additional Sessions Judge.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and have gone through the police file. The fatal injury caused to the deceased is attributed to the petitioner. He is named in the F.I.R. with a specific role. Mere filing of affidavits of certain persons without any corroborative evidence is not a sufficient factor to shake the veracity of the story put by the complainant, duly supported by the eye-witnesses. In case of Nazir Ahmad v. The State PLD 1977 Lah. 1261 it was held that there are only three sections in the Code of Criminal Procedure, that is, sections 74, 526 and 539-A, according to which a fact may be got proved by affidavit. It follows that an affidavit not covered by these sections is not legal evidence. The same proposition came under consideration before the Supreme Court and their Lordships in the case of Mst. Bushran Bibi v. Nisar Ahmad Khan and others PLD 1990 SC 83 observed that even under Article 163 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, procedure of swearing on Holy Qur'an (oath proceedings) is not applicable in criminal cases. Furthermore, there is nothing on record to support the plea of alibi. The petitioner has finally been challaned and as such opinion of one of the Investigating Officer is of no avail to the petitioner and carries no weight. It was a brutal murder committed in broad daylight. No case for bail is thus made out. The application is dismissed. However, the learned Sessions Judge, Lahore is directed to expedite the trial of the case. N.H.Q./M-2014/L ??????????? Bail refused.