MLD 1985

1985 PLP 41(1) (MLD)

PERVEZ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1 of 1984 in Criminal Appeal No. 189 of 1984, decided on 27th June, 1984.
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1985 PLP 41(1) (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J
Parties PERVEZ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 PLP 41(1) (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 PLP 41(1) (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 PLP 41(1) (MLD) (PERVEZ AHMAD — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Representation

  • Dr. Farook Ahmad Chaudhry, Barrister for Petitioner.
  • Date of hearing: 27th June, 1984.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 426--Suspension of sentence--Case of vindication of family honour--Sentence could be suspended without going into appreciation of evidence--Bail allowed. Azmat Dad Khan for the State.

Judgment & Decree

S. 426--Suspension of sentence--Case of vindication of family honour--Sentence could be suspended without going into appreciation of evidence--Bail allowed. Dr. Farook Ahmad Chaudhry, Barrister for Petitioner. Azmat Dad Khan for the State. Date of hearing: 27th June, 1984. I am inclined to agree with the learned counsel for the petitioner that the sentence in this case can be suspended without going into the appreciation of evidence. It is a case of vindication of the honour of family. 2. The petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnished bail bond in the sum of Rs.50,000 (fifty thousand) with one surety in B the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judicial)I of this Court. M. Y. H. Bail granted.