1984 PLP 883 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER‑ — Respondents
| Citation | 1984 PLP 883 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Nasim Hasan Shah and S. A. Nusrat, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER‑ — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 883 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 883 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Nasim Hasan Shah and S. A. Nusrat, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 883 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, RAWALPINDI AND ANOTHER‑ — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- M. Kowkab Iqbal, Advocate Supreme Court and Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 27th March, 1984.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment, dated 21st March, 1984, of the Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench in W. P. No. 108/1984).
Art. 185 (3)‑West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13‑Ejectment for personal need of landlord‑Tenant unable to point out any error of law or principle committed by Rent Control authorities which required interference in writ jurisdiction Order of High Court dismissing writ petition against ejectment, there fore, unexceptionable‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21‑3‑1984 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench, whereby he dismissed the writ petition preferred by the petitioners against the order of the Rent Controller directing their ejectment from the shop in dispute on the ground, inter alia, of personal need, which order was upheld, on appeal, by the learned Additional District Judge. We have heard Mr. M. Kowkab Iqbal, in support of this petition. He has not been able to point out any error of the law or principle committed by the Rent Control authorities, which required interference in writ jurisdiction. The order of the High Court is, thus, unexceptionable. This petition, directed against the said order, must, therefore, fail. The petitioners, however, are allowed two months' time in order to enable them to make alternative arrangements for shifting their business to another commercial premises. This petition, subject to the above direction, stands dismissed. M.Z. M. Petition dismissed.