1991 PLP 1548 (SCMR)
MUHAMMAD ASHIQ — Petitioner Versus MAHMOOD AKHTAR ANSARI and another — Respondents
| Citation | 1991 PLP 1548 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Shafiur Rahman and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD ASHIQ — Petitioner Versus MAHMOOD AKHTAR ANSARI and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---Leave to appeal is granted to examine the following questions of law of public importance:, Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 1548 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---Leave to appeal is granted to examine the following questions of law of public importance:, Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 1548 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 1548 (SCMR) (MUHAMMAD ASHIQ — Petitioner Versus MAHMOOD AKHTAR ANSARI and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Asghar Ali Bhatti, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Aslam Chaudhry, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 25th July, 1989.
- Ch. Asghar Ali Bhatti, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Aslam Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 3-5-1986 passed in Case No. 207/304 of 1985).
S. 4
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)
Leave to appeal was granted to examine questions of law of public importance: whether appeal to Service Tribunal was at all competent on question of fitness/suitability of a person and whether interference by Service Tribunal on merits of case was at all called for. ORDER (1) Whether an appeal to the Tribunal was at all competent on the question of fitness/suitability of a person under section 4 of the Service Tribunals A Act, 1974? (2) Whether the interference by the Tribunal on merits of the case was at all called for?
2. We further find that the comments of the Senior Civil Judge/Selection Committee were at no stage asked for.
3. Let the photostat of the applications on which marking has been done be sent to the then Senior Civil Judge for confirmation of the marking and whether he stands by it, and for parawise comments on memo. of appeal presented to District Judge.
4. To be heard in the presence of the record during this year. H.B.T./M-1094/S Leave granted.
Judgment & Decree
SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑‑Leave to appeal is granted to examine the following questions of law of public importance:‑‑ (1) Whether an appeal to the Tribunal was at all competent on the question of fitness/suitability of a person under section 4 of the Service Tribunals A Act, 1974? (2) Whether the interference by the Tribunal on merits of the case was at all called for?
2. We further find that the comments of the Senior Civil Judge/Selection Committee were at no stage asked for.
3. Let the photostat of the applications on which marking has been done be sent to the then Senior Civil Judge for confirmation of the marking and whether he stands by it, and for parawise comments on memo. of appeal presented to District Judge.
4. To be heard in the presence of the record during this year. H.B.T./M‑1094/S Leave granted.