1989 P Cr (PLP)
GUL RAHEEM and another‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1989 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Allahdino G. Memon, J |
| Parties | GUL RAHEEM and another‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Allahdino G. Memon, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 P Cr (PLP) (GUL RAHEEM and another‑‑Applicants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No injury was caused to deceased by accused and injury caused by him to prosecution witness was simple in nature‑‑No motive was alleged against accused in First Information Report‑‑Bail granted. Mrs. Salima Nasiruddin for Applicants. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, A.A. G. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34‑‑Bail, grant of‑‑No injury was caused to deceased by accused and injury caused by him to prosecution witness was simple in nature‑‑No motive was alleged against accused in First Information Report‑‑Bail granted. Mrs. Salima Nasiruddin for Applicants. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, A.A. G. for the State. The applicants are facing trial under section 302/34, P.P.C. before the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi (West). It has been contended by Mrs. Salima Nasiruddin that there is no allegation against the applicants that they caused any injury to deceased Jehanzeb, but the only allegation against them is that they caused simple injuries to complainant Gul Muhammad and P.W. Muhammad Yousuf. The F.I.R. does not show that there was any previous ill‑will between the parties, or there was any motive on the part of the accused to kill deceased Jehanzeb. Mr. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, learned A.A.G. appearing for the State has conceded to the grant of bail in view of the above circumstances. I have considered the contentions of the learned counsel and have gone through the F.I.R. and the order rejecting bail application. The F.I.R. clearly shows that the applicant Gul Raheem was armed with Danda and had caused injuries to Muhammad Yousuf, while applicant No.2 Bakhat Karim had given Chhuri blow to complainant, and the injuries on the person of both the injured are simple in nature. There is no allegation that any of the applicants had caused any injuries to the deceased. No motive is alleged m the F.I.R. In view of these circumstances it is yet to be‑seen whether the applicants had a common intention to commit murder of deceased Jehanzeb. I, therefore, direct that the applicants shall be released on bail on furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.50,000 each and bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. M.Y.H./G‑136/K Bail granted.