1981 CLC265 (PLP)
PARYAL‑Applicant Versus PUNHOON AND 3 OTHERS‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 CLC265 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | K A. Ghani, J |
| Parties | PARYAL‑Applicant Versus PUNHOON AND 3 OTHERS‑‑Respondents |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 CLC265 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 CLC265 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: K A. Ghani, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 CLC265 (PLP) (PARYAL‑Applicant Versus PUNHOON AND 3 OTHERS‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Syed Madadali Shah for Respondent No. 1.
- Abdul Sattar Sheikh, Addl. A. G, for Respondents Nos. 2 to 4.
- Dates of hearing : 2nd and 25th November 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
(3$ Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑‑ O. XXXIX, rr. I & 2‑Injunction, interim‑Fishery rights proposed to be leased out by public auction to highest bidder subject to approval of competent authority‑Power to grant or reject approval of bids without assigning any reason also expressly reserved‑Bids of plaintiff neither approved nor confirmed and in fact expressly rejected and plaintiff informed of lease rights having been proposed to be put to fresh auction on a specified date‑Bids, held, did not mature into any subsisting and binding contract‑Neither balance c;: convenience lay in favour of plaintiffs nor any irreparable loss or injury likely to be caused in case of injunction being not granted‑Petitioner also put in possession‑No case of issuance of injunction in circumstances made out.‑[Injunction]. Muhammad Umar Beg v. Sultan Mahmood Khan P L D 1970 S C 139 ; Pervalz Qureshi v. Settlement Commissioner 1974 S C M R 339 and Muhammad Hussain v. Ehsanuddin P L D 1973 Lah. 345 ref. Nooruddin Ramzan for Applicant.
Judgment & Decree
(3$ Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑ ‑‑ O. XXXIX, rr. I & 2‑Injunction, interim‑Fishery rights proposed to be leased out by public auction to highest bidder subject to approval of competent authority‑Power to grant or reject approval of bids without assigning any reason also expressly reserved‑Bids of plaintiff neither approved nor confirmed and in fact expressly rejected and plaintiff informed of lease rights having been proposed to be put to fresh auction on a specified date‑Bids, held, did not mature into any subsisting and binding contract‑Neither balance c;: convenience lay in favour of plaintiffs nor any irreparable loss or injury likely to be caused in case of injunction being not granted‑Petitioner also put in possession‑No case of issuance of injunction in circumstances made out.‑[Injunction]. Muhammad Umar Beg v. Sultan Mahmood Khan P L D 1970 S C 139 ; Pervalz Qureshi v. Settlement Commissioner 1974 S C M R 339 and Muhammad Hussain v. Ehsanuddin P L D 1973 Lah. 345 ref. Nooruddin Ramzan for Applicant. Syed Madadali Shah for Respondent No.
1. Abdul Sattar Sheikh, Addl. A. G, for Respondents Nos. 2 to