1989 PLP 78 (CLC)
ABDUL GHAFOOR‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and 2 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1989 PLP 78 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Ajmal Mian, J |
| Parties | ABDUL GHAFOOR‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and 2 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 78 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 78 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Ajmal Mian, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 78 (CLC) (ABDUL GHAFOOR‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ and 2 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- A . H Rajput for Petitioner. Naeem Ahmed for Respondents. Date of hearing: 3rd April, 1988.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑5. 115‑‑Revision‑‑Petitioner in his suit for declaration, possession and injunction claimed land in dispute as part and parcel of his plot‑‑Courts below recorded concurrent findings that petitioner had failed to produce any reliable evidence in support of his claim‑‑Findings of Courts below in consonance with evidence on record and petitioner failed to point out any document on record which might be contrary to findings‑‑Interference declined by High Court in revision.
Judgment & Decree
Civil Revision No. 49 of 1988, decided on 3rd April, 1988. ‑‑‑5. 115‑‑Revision‑‑Petitioner in his suit for declaration, possession and injunction claimed land in dispute as part and parcel of his plot‑‑Courts below recorded concurrent findings that petitioner had failed to produce any reliable evidence in support of his claim‑‑Findings of Courts below in consonance with evidence on record and petitioner failed to point out any document on record which might be contrary to findings‑‑Interference declined by High Court in revision. A . H Rajput for Petitioner. Naeem Ahmed for Respondents. Date of hearing: 3rd April, 1988. This revision is directed against the judgment/decree dated 10‑5‑1986 and 22‑12‑1987 passed by the VIIIth Senior Civil Judge and 1st Additional District Judge (South) Karachi, in Suit No.4099 of 1980 and Civil Appeal No.88 of 1986 respectively.
2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the above revision are that the present petitioner filed aforesaid suit for declaration, possession and injunction in respect of land measuring about 59 sq. yds. of which respondent No.l has been granted lease by respondent No.3 on the ground of possession of unauthorised land. The case of the petitioner before the two Courts below was that the above 59 sq. yds. land was part and parcel of Excise No. AK‑19/A‑8S‑
18. However, A both the Courts below have recorded concurrent findings that the petitioner has failed to produce any reliable evidence in support of his claim that the suit plot was part and parcel of his above plot. The above concurrent findings seems to be in consonance with the evidence on record inasmuch as the petitioner has failed to point out to me any document on record which may be contrary to the above finding.
3. I would, therefore, dismiss the above revision in limine. M.Y.H/A‑328/K Petition dismissed.