1994 PLP 1203 (MLD)
ZOBIA JAMAL — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
| Citation | 1994 PLP 1203 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | ZOBIA JAMAL — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION |
| Primary Law | Board of Intermediate Examination Rules, 1993 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1994 PLP 1203 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Board of Intermediate Examination Rules, 1993 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1994 PLP 1203 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1994 PLP 1203 (MLD) (ZOBIA JAMAL — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Rao Munawar Khan for Petitioner,
- Ch. Ejaz Ahmad, Legal Advisor with Shahid Waheed for Respondents.
- Ch. Ijaz Ahmad learned counsel appearing for respondent has reiterated his argument advanced earlier in the fore mentioned writ petition and has stated that after the deletion of Rule 12, the concessional marks are no more available.
Headnotes / Summary
R.12
Concessional marks
High Court had already issued direction for grant of concessional marks to candidates through its order passed in an earlier Constitutional petition
Fact and points involved in the petition being completely same as were considered and decided in earlier petition, Board was directed to grant required concessional marks under R.12 of Rules 1993 to the candidate.
Judgment & Decree
Petitioner through this Constitutional petition has sought direction for the grant of concessional marks under Rule 12 of the Board of Intermediate Examination Rules, 1993. It is the case of the petitioner that she appeared in Intermediate Annual Examination, 1993 (Composite System) conducted by the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore and failed to qualify a subject. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has argued that this Court has already issued direction for the grant of concessional marks in W.P. No.15235 of 1993 through its judgment dated 30-11-1993 wherein identical points of law and facts were involved. Ch. Ijaz Ahmad learned counsel appearing for respondent has reiterated his argument advanced earlier in the fore mentioned writ petition and has stated that after the deletion of Rule 12, the concessional marks are no more available. I have given my anxious consideration and have noticed that the facts and points involved in the present writ petition are completely the same as were considered/decided by me through W.P. 15235 of 1993. In this view of the matter I do not feel it necessary to repeat the same all again. Since the judgment is already in field and no argument has been advanced by the learned counsel for the respondent so as to take a different view, as such, I accept this writ petition and direct the respondent Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education to grant concessional marks as envisaged under Rule 12 of Intermediate Examination Rules to the petitioner after full verification. There shall be no order as to costs. H.B.T./Z-104/L Petition, accepted.