MLD 2004

2004 PLP 1526 (MLD)

MEHR ALI‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAVEED and others‑‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
Crl. Revision No.264 of 2004, decided on 21st April, 2004.
Honorable Judges
Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 2004 PLP 1526 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J
Parties MEHR ALI‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAVEED and others‑‑‑Respondents
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2004 PLP 1526 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2004 PLP 1526 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 2004 PLP 1526 (MLD) (MEHR ALI‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD NAVEED and others‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Headnotes / Summary

Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S.7‑‑‑Age of accused‑‑‑Determination of‑‑‑Constitution of Medical Board‑‑‑Three Radiologists were directed to examine accused in order to determine his age‑‑‑Petitioner/complainant had submitted that for determination of the age of accused a Board consisting of five special Doctors, including Medical Superintendent of Hospital, Radiologist, Dental Surgeon, Orthopedic Surgeon and Doctor be constituted who would determine the physical appearance of accused‑‑‑Addl. Advocate General had also submitted that besides Radiologist, a Dental Surgeon was very necessary because he had to examine the teeth of accused in order to determine his age‑‑‑Court after considering that Medical Board was not constituted properly, directed the Medical Superintendent of Hospital concerned to constitute a Board consisting of Medical Superintendent himself, Senior Radiologist, Dental Surgeon, Orthopedic Surgeon and a Professor of Medicine so that actual age of accused could come on record‑‑‑Said Board after examining accused, would submit report before Trial Court which would decide the matter after perusing said report in accordance with law. Maaz Allah Khan Sherwani, Advocate. Ch. Abdul Rashid, Advocate. Muhammad Hanif Khatana, Addl. A.‑G. Mumtaz Ahmad, Legal Advisor, Service Hospital, Lahore.

Judgment & Decree

Dr. Riaz Ahmad Chaudhry, Medical Superintendent, Services Hospital, Lahore present in Court submits that there was no order from the learned trial Court to constitute a special Medical Board in order to determine the age of the present respondent. He further submits that three Radiologists were directed to examine the respondent in order to determine his age.

2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the determination of the age five special doctors should be there, that's. Medical Superintendent of the Hospital, Radiologist, Dental Surgeon, Orthopedic Surgeon and the doctor who determine the physical appearance of the accused.

3. On the other hand, learned Addl. A.‑G also does not agree with the submission made by Medical Superintendent, Services Hospital, Lahore. He also submits that besides the Radiologist, Dental Surgeon is cry necessary because he has to examine the teeth of accused in order to determine his age.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent submits that in this case birth certificate of the accused/respondent was produced and that was sufficient enough to determine the age of the accused. He further submits that no case for interference is made out.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. I had summoned the record and had also seen the report of three Radiologists. I have also seen for the first time in this case that only a Board of three Radiologists was constituted for the determination of age of the accused/respondent. According to section 7 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, "whenever a question arises as to whether a person before the Court is a juvenile or not, 'there shall record a finding after such inquiry which shall include a medical report for determination of the age of the child".

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I am of considered opinion that the Board was not constituted properly, therefore, this petition is accepted and the order impugned is set aside. I direct Medical Superintendent, Services Hospital to constitute a Board consisting of Medical Superintendent, i.e. himself, Senior Radiologist, Dental Surgeon, Orthopedic Surgeon and a Professor of Medicine so that the actual age of the accused may come on record. This procedure and practice shall be adopted in all such‑like cases in future also. After examining the accused/respondent, the Board shall submit his report before the learned trail Court, who would decide the matter after perusing the said report in accordance with law. The accused/respondent shall be produced by the Superintendent Camp Jail, Lahore before Medical Superintendent, Services Hospital, Lahore on 29‑4‑2004 at 10‑00 a.m. in his office. Learned Addl. A.‑G. will inform about the order of this Court to Superintendent Camp Jail, Lahore. Copy of this order shall also be sent to Medical Superintendent, Services Hospital, Lahore. This petition stands disposed of. H.B.T./M‑298/L Order accordingly.