1986 P Cr (PLP)
MUMTAZ KHAN and 6 others‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1986 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Ijaz Nisar, J |
| Parties | MUMTAZ KHAN and 6 others‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Ijaz Nisar, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 P Cr (PLP) (MUMTAZ KHAN and 6 others‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- S.M. Latif Khan Khosa for Petitioners Nos.1 to 5.
- Syed Shakir Ali Rizvi for Petitioner No.6.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑S.426‑‑Sentence, suspension of‑‑Petitioners attributed simple sticks injuries to victim‑of assault‑‑Sentence suspended and petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) ‑‑‑S.426‑‑Sentence, suspension of‑‑Specific knife injuries attributed to petitioners‑‑Suspension of sentence declined in circumstances. Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui for the State.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑S.426‑‑Sentence, suspension of‑‑Specific knife injuries attributed to petitioners‑‑Suspension of sentence declined in circumstances. S.M. Latif Khan Khosa for Petitioners Nos.1 to
5. Syed Shakir Ali Rizvi for Petitioner No.6. Muhammad Rafi Siddiqui for the State. The petitioners stand convicted under sections 148, 307 and 452, P.P.C. Under section 148, they have been sentenced to three years' R.I. each, under section 307, P.P.C., six years' R.I. each, under section 452, P.P.C., six years' R.I. each. All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The appeal is being adjourned for non‑appearance of Mr. M.B. Zaman, counsel for the complainant. On the last date of hearing it was mentioned in the order that in case Mr. M.B. Zaman, Advocate is not available the next date of hearing, the prayer for suspension of sentence shall be considered. Mr. M.B. Zaman, Advocate is not available even today.
3. Seven petitioners are charged with murderously assaulting Muhammad Khan P.W. with knives and sticks. Munawar, Mumtaz and Firdaus carried knives while Abdul Aziz, War, Riaz and Mirza Khan were armed with Lathis. All of them are alleged to have attacked and injured Muhammad Khan. The attack was opened by Munawar who was armed with a knife. Specific knives injuries are attributed to Munawar, Mumtaz and Firdaus. The injuries of Munawar and Mumtaz were found grievous and dangerous to life while the injury attributed to Firdaus and other petitioners were simple in nature. The injury attributed to Firdaus was on the wrist and was simple in nature. No specific injury is attributed to Abdul Aziz, Zafar, Mirza Khan and Riaz but there is a general allegation against them that they also indulged in assaulting Muhammad Khan after he had been given knives injuries by Munawar, Mumtaz and Firdaus.
4. In these circumstances, I feel persuaded to suspend the sentence of Abdul Aziz, Zafar, Mirza Khan and Riaz to whom simple sticks injuries are attributed. They shall be released on bail on furnishing surety bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Sargodha.
5. However, the prayer for suspension of sentence in respect of Munawar, Mumtaz and Firdaus is dismissed because specific knives injuries are attributed to them. They may, however, apply again if the appeal is not disposed of in time. S. G. D. Order accordingly.