2009 P Cr (PLP)
AAMAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2009 P Cr (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | AAMAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 P Cr (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 P Cr (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 P Cr (PLP) (AAMAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ch. Muhammad Shahid Buttar for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.365-B
Accused though had not been declared innocent, but sufficient material had been collected by the Investigating Officer in support of the plea taken by accused that in fact the complainant being sui juris had contracted Nikah with him out of her free will and consent
Even otherwise, there was delay of seventeen days in lodging the F.I.R.
Accused was not required for the purpose of investigation
Judgment & Decree
ZAFAR IQBAL CHAUDHRY, J.
Through this petition under section 497, Cr.P.C. Aamar Ali petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.423 dated 29-5-2008 registered under section 365-B, P.P.C. at Police Station Factory Area, District Sheikhupura on the application of Mst. Nighat Tahira with the allegation that the petitioner along with his co-accused had abducted the complainant and forcibly obtained her signatures and thumb-impression on the Nikahnama, stamp-papers and other documents. The accused were also alleged to have taken I.D. Card, F.A. Degree, Mobile Phone and other important documents of the complainant.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been involved in this case falsely on account of mala fide of the complainant; that according to the F.I.R. the complainant had been forcibly abducted by two unknown persons who after abduction brought in the Courts of Ferozewala and then forcibly got her signatures on different papers and prepared forged Nikahnama; that during the investigation it has been found that the petitioner had gone there of her own and contracted Nikah with the petitioner out of her free will; that the Investigating Officer has collected sufficient evidence in this behalf and on the basis of the evidence on the record the petitioner has been declared innocent.
3. Learned D.P.-G. on the instructions of Safdar Pervaiz S.-I. and after perusal of the record is not in a position to controvert the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner. However, he submits that though the petitioner has not been declared innocent but the plea taken by the petitioner has been proved during investigation through the evidence produced by him.
4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the record. Although the petitioner has not been declared innocent, but sufficient material has been collected by the Investigating Officer in support of the plea taken by the petitioner that in fact the complainant being sui juris has contracted Nikah with him out of her free will and consent. Even otherwise there is delay of seventeen days in lodging the F.I.R. The petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation. Moreover, no allegation of Zina has been levelled against him. Hence this petition is accepted and the petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. H.B.T./A-4/L Bail granted.