2007 PLP 2818 (YLR)
ABDUL LATEEF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 2007 PLP 2818 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J |
| Parties | ABDUL LATEEF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2007 PLP 2818 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2007 PLP 2818 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Farrukh Mahmud, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2007 PLP 2818 (YLR) (ABDUL LATEEF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Javed Akhtar Wains for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 497
Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.324, 337-L(ii) & 337-H(ii)
Accused was in jail for about a year
Single injury on the left leg of complainant was attributed to accused--Police record showed that injury did not cause any serious damage as same had been mentioned as offence under S. 337-L(ii), P.P.L
Despite the fact that accused was in jail for about a year, evidence of not a single witness had been recorded
Accused was admitted to bail, in circumstances. Rao Muhammad Atif Nawaz with Khalid Iqbal A.S.-I. for the State.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD FARRUKH MAHMUD, J.
Abdul Latif-petitioner has sought post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No.70; registered at Police Station Saddar Layyah, on 5-6-2005 for offences under sections 324/34/337-L(ii) /337-H(ii), PPC.
2. Succinctly, the allegation against the petitioner is that he while armed with 12-bore gun caused three fires, one of the fires caused injury on the left leg of the complainant.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been noticed that the petitioner was arrested in this case on 20-7-2005 and is in Jail for about a year; single injury on the left leg of the complainant is attributed to the petitioner; however, according to the police record the injury did not cause any serious damage as the same has been mentioned as offence under section 337-L(ii), P.P.C.; and furthermore, despite the fact that the petitioner was in Jail for about a year so far, as stated at bar, not a single witness has been recorded. In these circumstances, I allow this petition and admit the petitioner to bail, subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rupees Fifty Thousand, with one surety, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial Court. H.B.T./A-75/L Bail granted.