1990 PLP 1320 (MLD)
THE B.I.T. TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, NESRA RANCHI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE CHANCELLOR, RANCHI UNIVERSITY and others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1990 PLP 1320 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Bench Members | Ranganath Misra and M. M. Dutt, JJ |
| Parties | THE B.I.T. TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, NESRA RANCHI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE CHANCELLOR, RANCHI UNIVERSITY and others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Contempt of Court‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1990 PLP 1320 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Contempt of Court‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1990 PLP 1320 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of India bench comprising: Ranganath Misra and M. M. Dutt, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1990 PLP 1320 (MLD) (THE B.I.T. TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, NESRA RANCHI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE CHANCELLOR, RANCHI UNIVERSITY and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑ Matter related to benefit for teachers of University‑‑‑‑Contempt petition alleging that orders of Supreme Court were not implemented by University‑‑ Supreme Court gave direction on the suggestion of parties that pattern prevailing in other colleges be adopted‑‑‑Clarification on certain relevant aspects also issued by Supreme Court.
Judgment & Decree
2. We are of the view that the order of this Court dated 19th September, 1983 did intend to confer on the petitioners who opt within the time limit to get the benefits available to Post‑Graduate teachers in the University. Mr. Sorabjee agrees that if that was the view of the Court and we clarify that now, the respondent‑University would agree to comply with the terms of the order within the time now fixed by the Court.
3. It has been pointed out that there are two other Engineering Colleges affiliated to the Ranchi University and are located at Jamshedpur and Sindhry. Learned counsel for the petitioners has accepted the offer of Mr. Sorajbee to adopt the pattern prevailing in either of the two colleges and learned counsel for the petitioners has agreed to accept the pattern prevailing in the Jamshedpw Engineering College. Mr. Sorabjee has brought to our notice that with effect from 28th of August, 1986 the technological institute has been conferred the status of a deemed university.
4. Keeping all these aspects in view and on hearing learned counsel for the parties at great length, we clarify that‑‑‑ (1) the order of this Court dated 19th September, 1983 conferred benefits available to the Post‑Graduate teachers of the University keeping the three‑tire system in view on the teachers of the institute once their option was exercised and we direct those benefits to be extended to the teachers within two months from today. No application for extension of time will be entertained. (2) While giving effect to the benefits indicated above, the pattern obtaining in Jamshedpur Engineering College should he the basis. (3) It is agreed, and we direct, that with effect from 28th of August, 1986 ‑‑ when the deemed university status was conferred on the university the benefits and privileges for the teachers under the changed circumstances would be extended to the teachers of the institute. It is further made clear that while doing so any benefit conferred under our order with effect from 19th September, 1983 would not be taken away. (4) Either party would be at liberty to apply to this Court in case of any difficulty arising out of the adjustment on the basis of the deemed status. On no other count any application would be made to this Court.
5. This disposes of the application for initiating contempt proceedings. Z.S./167/F.C Order accordingly.