2009 PLP 1766 (YLR)
Mst. IMRANA NAZIR — Petitioner Versus S.P. REGIONAL INVESTIGATION BUREAU, BHAWALPUR and 6 others — Respondents
| Citation | 2009 PLP 1766 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | S. Ali Hassan Rizvi, J |
| Parties | Mst. IMRANA NAZIR — Petitioner Versus S.P. REGIONAL INVESTIGATION BUREAU, BHAWALPUR and 6 others — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2009 PLP 1766 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2009 PLP 1766 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: S. Ali Hassan Rizvi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2009 PLP 1766 (YLR) (Mst. IMRANA NAZIR — Petitioner Versus S.P. REGIONAL INVESTIGATION BUREAU, BHAWALPUR and 6 others — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shahzad Ashraf Mohandra for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Art.199
Constitutional petition
Petition had been filed by the petitioner lady for restraining the police from creating illegal harassment as she had entered into marriage with a man but respondent was behind her to disgrace her and was creating illegal harassment
Petitioner had alleged that her matrimonial life was in danger
Petitioner had also alleged that Police had also summoned the petitioner in its office in connection with transfer of investigation in the case
S.H.O. present in the court, had undertaken not to create any harassment; in the light of undertaking so given by the S.H.O.
Police was directed not to create any illegal harassment or to interfere into the matrimonial life of the petitioner
Police was also restrained to act otherwise than in due course of law. Ch. Shafi Muhammad Tariq, A.A.-G. with Muhammad Afzal, Inspector/ S.H.O. Respondent No.4 with record.
Judgment & Decree
S. ALI HASSAN RIZVI, J.
Parawise comments have already been filed.
2. Instant writ petition is filed restraining respondents Nos.1 to 4 not to create illegal harassment as allegedly the petitioner has entered into marriage with one Imran but respondent No.7 is behind her to disgrace and earlier to that he has also caused injuries to her brother; that an F.I.R. No.20/2008 under section 337-F(v), P.P.C. was registered and challan has been submitted but now respondent No.7 becoming in league with one Syed Imran Shah is creating illegal harassment and the petitioner apprehends that police would involve him in any case in order to support the said respondent No.7. The matrimonial life of the petitioner is in danger as respondents Nos.6 and 7 are creating harassment. That respondent No.1 has also summoned the petitioner in his office in connection with transfer of investigation in case, referred above. Whereas there is no such order for the transfer of investigation.
3. Heard.
4. Respondent No.4/S.H.O, present in Court, undertakes not to create any harassment and also states that he never summoned the petitioner.
5. In the light of undertaking given by respondent No.4/S. H.O, it is directed to the police not to create any illegal harassment or to interfere into the matrimonial life of the petitioner. Respondent No.1 is also restrained to act upon otherwise than due course of law. This petition stands disposed of accordingly. H.B.T./I-35/L Order accordingly.