1984 PLP 1280 (SCMR)
KALAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus ALI MUHAMMAD and another — Respondent
| Citation | 1984 PLP 1280 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | ---Arts. 185(3) & 199-- Dispute over transfer of evacuee property Order of High Court dismissing writ petition of petitioner found to be un exceptionable--Matter one of factual nature--Held, leave to appeal cannot be granted to reconsider, question -question of fact. --Question of fact |
| Bench Members | Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ |
| Parties | KALAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus ALI MUHAMMAD and another — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 1280 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 1280 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the ---Arts. 185(3) & 199-- Dispute over transfer of evacuee property Order of High Court dismissing writ petition of petitioner found to be un exceptionable--Matter one of factual nature--Held, leave to appeal cannot be granted to reconsider, question -question of fact. --Question of fact bench comprising: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 1280 (SCMR) (KALAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus ALI MUHAMMAD and another — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh.Islam-ul-Haq, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad AsIam Chaudhry, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- S.M.Nasim, Advocate Supreme Court with Walayat Umar Chaudhry, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.l.
- Date of hearing: 1st November, 1983
- Sh.Islam‑ul‑Haq, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad AsIam Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- S.M.Nasim, Advocate Supreme Court with Walayat Umar Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l.
Headnotes / Summary
(Against the judgment/order of the Lahore High Court, dated 18.3.1980, passed in Writ Petition No.1456/R of 1974).
Arts. 185(3) & 199-- Dispute over transfer of evacuee property Order of High Court dismissing writ petition of petitioner found to be un exceptionable--Matter one of factual nature--Held, leave to appeal cannot be granted to reconsider, question -question of fact. --[Question of fact]
Judgment & Decree
Sh.Islam‑ul‑Haq, Advocate Supreme Court with Muhammad AsIam Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. S.M.Nasim, Advocate Supreme Court with Walayat Umar Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l. Date of hearing: 1st November, 1983 ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑ The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the order of the Lahore High Court dated 18‑3‑1980,,dismissing his writ petition in a settlement matter.
2. The parties in this case have been transferred separate houses bearing Nos.43 and 45 respectively. They have however been litigating since 1959 about one room which is situated in House No.45. After protracted litigation before the Settlement authorities as well as before the High Court it was decided that the room in dispute is part of House No.45 transferred to the respondent. The petitioner is aggrieved by this order. Hence the present petition.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. We have also gone through the impugned judgment. We feel that the same is un exceptionable. In any case the matter relates only factual matter and do not consider it a fit case for grant of leave in order to reconsider a sari question of fact. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. S Q . Petition dismissed.